Why Is the Political Right So Anti-Abortion?

The immediate reason is exerting power, in this instance over women. The long term reason is they just need more people being born to serve the wealthy as workers or die in some future war as soldiers.

Democrats make into a women's rights issue or freedom because you can't justify dead babies, so they deflect with this bullshit. Killing babies is wrong. Religion or not.

It is not about politics. It is about fertility cultishness of ethnic celtic people. The main ethnicity of the people who are anti-abortion are ethnic celtic people. Back in time when celtic people controlled most of europe, ethnic celtic people were very polygynous people. In a celtic tribe many celtic kids would be born to harem celtic females but the celtic fathers of those kids would not take care of their kids because the celtic males who bred the celtic females were high status polygynous celtic males who did not care for their kids. Most all celtic kids in a tribe had no father to take care of them some celtic tribes evolved fertility cultishness with the affect that the kids of polygyny would be taken care of by the celtic people rather than by their biological celtic father. A celtic tribe that had fertility cultishness that caused celtic people to take care of their polygyny born celtic kids survived and thrived compared to a celtic tribe who did not have fertility cultishness in their genetics in which case the celtic kids mostly died.

In the USA, celtic people know that the primary group of males who get their babies aborted are ethnic celtic males. Celtic people's psychology is still that of a polygynous celtic tribe and celtic fertility cultish christians will perform their evolutionary duty of taking care of the cetlic kids who are born from polygyny.

And just so you know, if you killed all of the celtic "christians" who are anti-abortion, a portion of celtic people who are liberal would just take their place and be the celtic "christians" who take care of the celtic kids. The reason why this is is because all celtic people are descedants of a high status polygynous celtic male who had both the liberal, "have sex all the time" genetics and the fertility cultish "christian" genetics together in his genes. The celtic group is an organism that will heal itself if parts of it are killed even if you do not like those parts.

I find it odd or even hypocritical as to how those who are anti choice are also pro gun for two reasons.
1) They don't want a fetus to be killed yet they have no problem at all with children getting killed by guns and will put their gun rights above the safety of children.
2) They want to take away the choice of what a woman can do with her body and yet they do not want the choice taken away for them to own a deadly weapon.
Which just further shows that the term they apply to themselves as being, "Pro life," really is not at all.

its killing unborn babies, that is satanic and fucked up. if unborn babies have no right than nobodies lives mean anything. it sets a dangerous precedent. giving woman the "right" to kill kids is the same as giving serial killers the "right" to kill innocent people cuz they feel like it...

At 8 months 3 weeks does the woman still have the "RIGHT to have full AUTONOMY over her OWN body" by having the fully formed baby killed? Does she have the "woman's RIGHT TO CHOOSE" at that point?

It's because in their minds the rights of the unborn child to live trump the right to choose to kill it (in their minds murder it), unless the life of the mother is at risk (although some of them take it to even that extreme). You have to understand where they're coming from to grasp this, even those who aren't religious (a number that's steadily decreasing). It's not quite the contradiction or hypocrisy you might think it is once you get into their mindset of there always being two living beings involved (in the most ardently religious, even just the initially conceived cells constitute a living being, e.g. the morning after pill, and of course the really out there see prevention as a "sin", but I do think those groups are a minority, albeit a very vocal one). In my experience many "conservatives" aren't totally anti-abortion.

I personally, as a non-ideologue, would like there to be limits (barring exigent circumstances, of course). Abortion right up until birth disturbs me. Studies are needed to determine where the line is. Right now, barring a more definitive scientific definition, I'd welcome a policy of roughly determining when a fetus would be viable outside the womb, perhaps at the third trimester, around 30 to 40 weeks (although some have survived as early as 24 weeks), and imposing some form of deterrent. I've spoken with both conservatives and liberals who lean this way. This can't be an all or nothing proposition like ideologues at both ends of the political spectrum tend to make it. Like everything, it should be treated with nuance and measured thoughtfulness instead of emotionally-charged, passionate fervor.
_________________________________________
Never believe. Always question. Rebuke belief, a.k.a. bias, a.k.a. groupthink, a.k.a. ideology, the bane of skeptical, logical reason.

By your logic, abortion should be legal to birth. I think most moral people believe that a healthy fetus has the right not to be attacked and killed.

It's something that most believe should be highly regulated and that's what Republicans support.