MovieChat Forums > Politics > House passes bill to ban assault weapons

House passes bill to ban assault weapons


The House on Friday passed a bill to ban assault weapons, securing a significant victory for Democrats following a spate of mass shootings across the country and marking the first time lawmakers have approved a prohibition on the popular firearms in more than two decades.

The legislation, titled the Assault Weapons Ban of 2022, cleared the chamber in a 217-213 vote.



Republican Reps. Chris Jacobs (N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.) supported the measure, while Democratic Reps. Henry Cuellar (Texas), Jared Golden (Maine), Vicente Gonzalez (Texas), Kurt Schrader (Ore.) and Ron Kind (D-Wis.) voted “no.”

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced Friday morning that the House would take up the legislation that afternoon, scheduling the last-minute vote days after she said the chamber would punt consideration of the legislation to next month.

Democrats had planned to move the assault weapons ban with community safety legislation under one rule, but ultimately decided to consider them separately after some liberals voiced concerns about a lack of accountability in the police measures.

The assault weapons ban legislation, led by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) and co-sponsored by 207 voting Democrats, specifically calls for prohibiting the sale, manufacture, transfer or import of various semi-automatic assault weapons, semi-automatic pistols and semi-automatic shotguns, depending on their features.

For example, all semi-automatic rifles that can accept detachable magazines and have a pistol grip, a forward grip, a grenade launcher, a barrel shroud, a threaded barrel or a folding, telescoping or detachable stock are subject to the ban.

Semi-automatic assault rifles with fixed magazines that can accept more than 15 rounds are subject to the ban would also be prohibited under the legislation, except those with an attached tubular device that can only hold .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.

Though it received bipartisan support in the House, the legislation has little chance of progressing in the Senate because of widespread Republican opposition. Still, House Democrats had pressed leadership for the chance to vote on the measure to send a message that they are fighting for an issue that has increased in popularity in recent years.

A poll conducted by Fox News in June found that 63 percent of registered voters support banning assault weapons.

Former President Clinton enacted an assault weapons ban in 1994 but it expired 10 years later, and Democrats have not had the support to pass another measure of its kind since.

During debate on the House floor Friday, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said the “common sense reform” in the bill “will save the lives of law enforcement officers and innocent Americans across the country.”

“A moment of silence is not enough. I should have counted how many moments of silence we have had on this Floor this year and lamented the loss of children and the elderly and everybody in between because of a weapon that is designed to kill a lot of people quickly. No more moments of silence. Let’s act,” he later added.

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, however, argued that the measure was unconstitutional and asserted that the bill “won’t make communities safer.”

“Democrats tried this ban before, It didn’t work. It won’t work now. And you know what it will do? It’ll make communities, I think, less safe,” he said.

“This bill is wrong, it will make communities, I think, less safe, and it’s unconstitutional,” he added.

The vote on an assault weapons ban is the latest firearm-related legislation the House has passed following a string of mass shootings that have plagued the country.

Last month, the House and Senate both cleared a gun safety bill in a bipartisan manner, which President Biden signed into law.

The measure enhanced background checks for gun purchasers ages 18 to 21 and established a federal offense for individuals obtaining firearms through straw purchases or trafficking, among other provisions.

The bill marked the first time in almost three decades that Congress had approved significant legislation to combat gun violence.

The House in June also cleared a bill to nationalize red flag laws and a sweeping package that included a number of gun-related provisions, including one that would have raised the minimum age to purchase a semi-automatic weapon from 18 to 21 and prohibited civilian use of ammunition with magazines that have more than 15 rounds. Both measures, however, garnered little Republican support and have not been taken up in the Senate.

The push for gun legislation came after a gunman opened fire at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, killing 19 students and two adults. Ten days before that, a gunman fatally shot 10 Black individuals in a racially motivated attack at a grocery store in Buffalo, N.Y.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/3580314-house-passes-bill-to-ban-assault-weapons/

reply

They waste their time every year doing this. I guess it gives their friends in the homo media something to write about.It dies when it gets to the senate though.

reply

"the homo media"


🤔

reply

They are or if they weren't they would be having real jobs.

reply

YEAH...TALK ALL YOU WANT...THAT MADE YOU SOUND LIKE AN IGNORANT MORON.

reply

Typing in all caps makes you look like an ignorant moron. Yoozally dun bi folx thet caint fukkin spel.

reply

SPEAKING OF IGNORANT MORONS...HI CRAIG!👍🏾

reply

Your momma thinks I'm pretty smart.

reply

MAKES SENSE...SHE IS A 70 YEAR OLD DEAF WOMAN WHO SPENDS ALL DAY YELLING AT HER DOG...BUT SHE IS VERY NICE AND FRIENDLY.

reply

Even though it'll fail in the senate, there was a time AR-15's were banned back in the Clinton days and it showed it worked until Bush let it expire.

reply

Wrong, it did not work. Both the DOJ and the FBI concluded that it did not work. Just as this one won't work. It's about control. It's unconstitutional and every piece of shit that votes for it should be tried for treason.

reply

You are wrong. The DOJ released a report showing that it worked very well. Of course it was, and is, constitutional--the word "regulate" is right there in the amendment! None so blind as those who will not see.

reply

well regulated, yes.

reply

We already regulate guns. Just because some people think these guns are "weapons of war" doesn't mean its true.

Also, the data isn't so clear on if the 1994 ban of ARs actually worked. For example, in the first several years after it expired mass shootings still averaged the same compared to the prior 10 years. While we did see a sharp increase in 2007 was it because of the ban expiring? There is no way to tell because in 1999 we saw another sharp increase, while the ban was still in place.

reply

No, it didn't. That is why it was allowed to expire without a whimper.

You're obviously too stupid to understand what "well regulated" means in that context. Which is not even to mention how fucking retarded you have to be to think the Bill of Rights says anything that limits the rights of individuals. God, pick up a book. That's an argument for idiots, by idiots.

reply

It wasn't a ban on AR's but on certain modifications. It was misleadingly titled the assault weapons ban. Lot more mass shootings since it expired but that could just be due to crazy people taking the easy way out / claiming their 15 minutes of fame.

reply

What are you talking about?

reply

This dude explains it a lot better than I can:

https://youtu.be/5ZoYEiui7iM

reply

I don't need it explained to me. I know exactly how it worked, I lived it.

reply

DemoKKKrats have no room to bitch about law abiding citizens having guns while they are actively trying to release violent thugs, criminals and insurrectionists. I guess they want to disarm law abiding citizens so that BLM can murder them.

reply