MovieChat Forums > Politics > Now that Idaho arrest is "fake" too?! BH...

Now that Idaho arrest is "fake" too?! BHAHAHAHAHA!

posted 2 years ago by kuatorises (7467)
29 replies | jump to latest

This story has been posted at least 3 times by TMZ. Each time, it's drawn comments that it's staged. "They're FBI agents" is the popular Trumper theory.

https://twitter.com/TMZ/status/1536098557287186434
https://twitter.com/E_PulliamJr/status/1536113972428120065
https://twitter.com/AsShopped/status/1536106917566640128
https://twitter.com/BigDaddy10k/status/1536001430603038722
https://twitter.com/joshdarwin/status/1536004475038666752

LOL! How can you people still play this card with a straight face? It's become the conservative version of "yOu'Re A rACiSt!" It's statistically impossible for everything you don't like or disagree with to be a hoax. HAHAHAHAHAHA!

[–] B1cKsurN (17423) 2 years ago

They're feds, and you're a moron. Fall for more propaganda.

[–] kuatorises (7467) 2 years ago

Prove. It.

[–] B1cKsurN (17423) 2 years ago

You prove you're moron every time you post, I don't need to do anything. 🤣🤣

[–] kuatorises (7467) 2 years ago

"I don't need to do anything"

You spelled "can't" wrong.

[–] CowherPower4Ever (241) 2 years ago

At this point either way these stories need to be taken with a grain of salt. After all the lies in the Whitmer case its hard to trust these stories.

[–] kuatorises (7467) 2 years ago

This isn't true because Whitmer? This is a real argument to you?

[–] Burk48917 (11365) 2 years ago

It shows precedent

[–] kuatorises (7467) 2 years ago

Precedent by who?

[–] Burk48917 (11365) 2 years ago

Do you understand the definition of the word?

[–] kuatorises (7467) 2 years ago

Precedent. By. Who?

[–] Burk48917 (11365) 2 years ago

It was a direct reply to your discussion about the Whitmer situation, which you mentioned by name. Are you really that easily confused, or are you being obtuse as a convenience?

[–] kuatorises (7467) 2 years ago

This conversation has nothing to do with Whitmer no matter how hard you try and deflect.

[–] Burk48917 (11365) 2 years ago

🤣
"This isn't true because Whitmer? This is a real argument to you?"
These are your words you idiot, what the fuck are you talking about? And you try to suggest I'M deflecting? You fucking snowflake liberals crack me up.😂

[–] Rorikon (17872) 2 years ago

Kavanaugh hitman was a FBI informant as well. No real assassin would go to location then start having second thoughts and instead of shooting, goes up to the marshal's to tell them they're unwell. Staged acting by the GOP.

Too bad the Dems don't play QAnon-style so they can get their own people drummed up as well. Conspiracy theories work wonders.

[–] kuatorises (7467) 2 years ago

Oh, I hadn't heard that one. It blows my mind they can continue to play this card.

[–] JoWilli (19964) 2 years ago

"It's statistically impossible for everything you don't like or disagree with to be a hoax."

ironically, dems said the same thing about the 2020 election, they said it was the most fair and honest election in 250 years.

also dems said that the 2016 election was a fraud, sham, hoax, chicanery, scam, grift, cheating, collusion, it wasnt fair, electoral college should be banned, only popular votes count, Trump didnt win, he cheated, Russia, Putin, Steele Dossier, Mueller.

[–] kuatorises (7467) 2 years ago

This is called deflection.

[–] JoWilli (19964) 2 years ago

It's statistically impossible for everything you don't like or disagree with to be a hoax or a conspiracy.

[–] kuatorises (7467) 2 years ago

Yes, yes it is. However, your single comment is not "everything" despite what your inflated sense of self-worth tells you.

[–] JoWilli (19964) 2 years ago

That sounds like deflection to me. How does one know whats real or fake news?

[–] kuatorises (7467) 2 years ago

"That sounds like deflection to me."

That's because you don't know what deflection means.

[–] JoWilli (19964) 2 years ago

This conversation is going nowhere no matter how hard you try and deflect.

[–] Lord Rake (4454) 2 years ago

CNN tells one which is the difference.

[–] JoWilli (19964) 2 years ago

ok thanks, I was unsure which news organization to believe. from now on CNN is real news.

[–] Gd5150 (11750) 2 years ago

No it’s called common sense and the ability to think for one’s self.

[–] Gd5150 (11750) 2 years ago

Curious. What crime did they commit? Why were they all wearing the exact same thing (the fbi stater kit). How come their faces remained covered after they were apprehended? (Against police policy). Whittmier. Smollett. Jan6hx. Ray Epps. Russia Collusion. TWA800. FBI file gate. Hillary email server.

Yeah no reason to be skeptical at all. Lol!!!

[–] kuatorises (7467) 2 years ago

PROVE. IT.

[–] Gd5150 (11750) 2 years ago

They were arrested for “conspiracy to riot”. LMAO!!!

They brought in the FBI for that? Misdemeanor. Rotf!!!

Sure sounds legit. It would take a real dumbass lemming to not know what’s up. Oh there’s Kuatolemming, we have a winner!

[–] kuatorises (7467) 2 years ago

PROVE. IT. :)