MovieChat Forums > Politics > 31 White Supremacists/Neo-Nazis Arrested...

31 White Supremacists/Neo-Nazis Arrested Before Attack

posted 2 years ago by Keelai (34858)
72 replies | jump to latest

The group came from several states and want to replace democracy with a Fascist state like Hitler's Germany.

A concerned individual contacted authorities to alert them after seeing the masked domestic terrorists crowd into the back of a truck. They were arrested minutes before arriving to a crowded parade area.

The FBI has warned of an increased threat by far-right extremist terrorists before the midterm elections.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/coeur-dalene-patriot-front-arrests-pride-u-haul/

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

So White right wingers get arrested BEFORE the protest in an Orwellian "conspiracy to riot" charge, reminiscent of the movie Minority Report, but leftist and Black BLM rioters who killed 30 people and caused billions in damages and leftist who rioted at the White house at 5/29 and burned a church get set free.

These people didn't do anything wrong. It's not illegal to protest and you can't charge anyone for a crime they are about to commit. Meanwhile leftists get their charges dropped.

[–] Keelai (34858) 2 years ago

Your comment is ignorant. People are arrested before they commit crime all the time. Example: attempted robbery; attempted rape

More GOPers are turning against your cult leader Trump for his attempt to overthrow democracy. 830 arrests and counting!

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

Wrong analogy. If someone is arrested for attempted robbery, you have to prove their intent was to rob someone. In this case no one has proved their goal was to riot. Their goal was protest and it's not illegal to protest. The charges are frauds. If these were left wingers attempting to protest a right wing event, they would have not faced any charges. Why weren't Antifa thugs who rioted in Charlotsville charged. They turned a peaceful protest into violence. The right wingers had a legal permission.

[–] moviefanatic505 (6097) 2 years ago

They stole a laptop that is breaking the law. You are wrong again.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

Yeah stealing a laptop is so important that it warrants national headlines. I'm sure the fact they are White identatarians has no effect whatsoever on how they are treated or reported on.

[–] moviefanatic505 (6097) 2 years ago

Irrelevant the fact is they broke the law. So your claim about them peacefully protesting was a lie. If a law is broken it is no longer considered a peaceful protest.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

It's not irrelevant. White identatarians are always cast as villains in the media, regardless of what happens and who does actual wrong just like in Charlottesville when they were simply defending themselves from far left violent thugs. Protesting against transgenderism being promoted to children isn't a crime. One Black transsexual even exposed his genitals to children (which is a felony under Idaho law) at one of the events these guys were going to protest, yet there was no outrage, imagine if a right winger did this.

[–] moviefanatic505 (6097) 2 years ago

Stealing a laptop is a crime you just conceded to that. So your claim that they peacefully protested was a lie. I never claimed protesting against anything peacefully and lawfully is a crime. That's not all they did though. They broke the law by stealing a laptop.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

And you need a giant conspiracy of 31 people to steal a laptop? And it needs to be national headlines?

[–] moviefanatic505 (6097) 2 years ago

Irrelevant that's a crime, which means they were not peacefully protesting like you claimed. If any law is broken it's not a peaceful protest.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

Stealing a laptop is not a "conspiracy to riot". Why aren't they charged with theft thought? You don't go to jail for stealing a laptop, besides it's unlikely all 31 of them conspired to do it. The charges are fraud and are a political charade. If leftists did exactly that, they wouldn't be treated like this.

[–] moviefanatic505 (6097) 2 years ago

It's still breaking the law. So when you claimed it was a peaceful protest that was a lie.

Ha nope plenty of leftists get charged with felonies for committing a crime. That's another lie and you know it.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

You haven't answered my question. How is somebody stealing a laptop prove rioting? That's what they were charged with.

If leftists were planning to protest a right wing event, they wouldn't be charged with conspiracy to riot. Only White identatarians get treated this way. They are always demonized and blamed for everything. I guess it's a crime to want to have a country for your people, but only if you're White, Black and brown folks are allowed to have theirs.

[–] moviefanatic505 (6097) 2 years ago

I don't have to. I proved you lied when you claimed it was a peaceful protest.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

There wasn't even a protest, they were arrested before anything happened. There was no violence, therefor my clam was true.

[–] moviefanatic505 (6097) 2 years ago

Nope the law was broken. You claimed they broke no law that was a lie.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

I said they attempted a peaceful protest and that was true.

[–] moviefanatic505 (6097) 2 years ago

Attempted and did are two different things. Regardless of what was attempted they broke the law. So no it was not a peaceful protest. You lied.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

So no it was not a peaceful protest.

Where was there violence or rioting? Show me, or apologize and retract your statement about them being guilty of violence.

[–] moviefanatic505 (6097) 2 years ago

Where did I say violence occurred? I said the law was broken therefore that's not a peaceful protest. Your deflection is noted and dismissed. Not one time did I say violence occurred. Nice backpedal attempt.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

If there was no violence it was a peaceful protest. But you are apparently too dumb to make that logical connection.

[–] moviefanatic505 (6097) 2 years ago

Not when the law is broken. The laptop was stolen therefore a law was broken. So nope. Had blm broken a law you wouldn't have called it peaceful. Your group is not exempt simply because they play for your ideological/political team.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

You said it wasn't peaceful. Theft is not necessarily violence. Also why are they not charged with theft then instead of "conspiracy to riot" when there is no evidence they intended violence.

BLM did much worse things than stealing stuff. They rioted, burned and destroyed and hurt/killed people.

[–] moviefanatic505 (6097) 2 years ago

I said they broke the law which they did. A peaceful protest requires following the law. They did not.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

Nope a peaceful protest means that there is no violence or rioting. They didn't cause any violence. Why are they charged with rioting when they didn't riot? (because they hold heretical political views that's why) Why are you evading the question?

[–] moviefanatic505 (6097) 2 years ago

Nope it requires following the law. You lost another point. Me 26 you 0.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

You can not follow the law and still not be violent. If I run over a red light it's against the law, but it's not violence. If I get caught with marihuana, it's against the law, but it's not violence.

Why aren't Antifa ever charged with "conspiracy to riot"?

Nope I won every single exchange we ever had.

[–] moviefanatic505 (6097) 2 years ago

Me 26 you 0.

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 2 years ago

Don't put too much stock in what moviefanatic505 says, he is on a whole other level of stupid.

And you are right, Antifa is a violent, far left terror movement.