"A former senior ad designer for the Republican National Committee who called the sexual abuse of babies his "absolute favorite" has been sentenced to 12 years in prison for receipt of child pornography."
https://www.newsweek.com/former-trump-aide-sentenced-12-years-requesting-videos-babies-1696205
He's a pederast... good riddance.
Still playing yourself on this subject huh? No one other than woke ideologues support grooming of children.
Dude, you can't win this. There is no nuance to grooming children. You either want to fuck them, or the thought of doing so utterly disgusts you.
Which side ya on, man?
It's clear what side they are on - op is trying 'whataboutism' to support leftist pedo activity.
Critical Groomer Theory 101.
They got a former Trump appointee too that was involved. Not a word from QAnon I bet.
shareStupid troll! He wasn't part of the RNC.
shareSorry, correction!
"An ex-GOP staffer who helped design social media ads for Donald Trumpโs re-election campaign has been sentenced to more than 12 years in prison for receiving hundreds of child sexual abuse materials, including videos of babies being raped."
But he only liked the video's of baby GIRLS getting raped, right?
sharecuz you ARE Not the Lovely LGBTQIA+ Community also Conversion therapy is unethical and inhumane not based on real science at all
shareCongratulations, you found ONE Republican who turned out to be a paedophile. This has nothing to do with which party publicly advocates grooming of children and teaching them homosexuality and transsexualism.
Gay male couple married by former justice Ginsberg accused of drugging and raping a s student:
https://i.postimg.cc/W4S7sKzN/8-AAF00-B1-C6-A2-48-DD-97-BA-E076-BE4-CE59-D.jpg
Gay rights activist and Obama donor Terry Bean sexually abused a 15 yearold boy in a hotel room with his boyfriend:
https://i.postimg.cc/s2n0T1p4/6-S-kq-V7y54-Y.jpg
I don't think they are calling ALL leftists "groomers", just the ones that are having a shit hemorrhage because they can't teach 5 year olds about sodomy. They just want to let a child think about, I don't know, trucks, dolls or coloring until they are 9.
shareCorrect, not all leftists - just the pedo ones who are falling over themselves to support teaching children 'adult love'.
May we string them up 1 by 1.
I don't suppose you can provide one single example of a public school teacher discussing sodomy with grade school children? And to be clear, acknowledging that some kids have two dads, is not a how-to course on anal play
shareJust so you know, anal sex isn't the only thing considered sodomy, so is bestiality and homosexuality. Here is an example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uMU9BCVO5w&ab_channel=KIERKAN77
And the law doesn't say anything about acknowledging some kids having homosexual parents, just that they can't teach the subject until they are 9 YEARS OLD for Christs sake. If they want to know what homosexual is, the teacher should say "ask your parents". What I wonder is, why is it so important for you and your ilk to get to them before 9?
So you yourself just posted an example of a class and nowhere in that discussion was anything sexual brought up. It was a general discussion about what being gay means and why you shouldn't be attacked for it. It was about as sexual as an afterschool special.
Also, it looked to be from the mid-90's, so it's completely out of date as well.
Please look for yourself. The internet is full of vids of parents at school board meetings, complaining about kids coming home talking about homosexuals and transsexuals. They don't want teachers talking to their kids about this topic. Its THEIR KIDS. I would bitch too. What is so hard for you people to respect parents wishes?
shareAn ad designer? Not only is that a weak example but you can't defend YOUR actions by blaming someone else of the same thing. You'd make a shit lawyer but I bet your NAMBLA membership must be in good standing, stooge.
shareDon't you have babies to rape?
shareThe real question is why do you want to teach pre-pubescent children about homosexuality???
shareWhen have I *ever* said that? I guess reading comprehension isn't your strong suit...
shareI guess you don't have enough sense to understand where the "groomer" reference comes from.
shareWrong.
"So if casting those who oppose this law as โpro-groomingโ is not rooted in evidence, what is it rooted in? In part, itโs a dog whistle to the partyโs most extreme, conspiracy-minded base. The foundation of the QAnon conspiracy theory is that there is a mass, secret, underground ring of Satanic pedophiles whose members consist of Democratic leaders and Hollywood elites. Painting anyone who opposes Floridaโs law (i.e., mainly Democrats) as being pro-grooming fits neatly into that narrative and winks at QAnon adherents without requiring politicians on the right to actually endorse the outlandish theory."
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-so-many-conservatives-are-talking-about-grooming-all-of-a-sudden/
๐๐๐๐๐
This thread!
It sums up the politics section of the forum perfectly.. โyou are!โโฆ โno, you are!โ
Pre-school level political debate. Itโs priceless.
Go take a walk in the sunshine and get some fresh air. Youโll all feel much happier. ๐