MovieChat Forums > Politics > Thank you RandalG for being such a contr...

Thank you RandalG for being such a contributer


Dear Randall, I would like to say that you are the most honest contributer on this forum. All of your sources are indeed the best and no one could ever tell you otherwise. The vaccine is indeed killing more people than covid and has been proven to be completely ineffective. You should run for president and make America a fine place again. I am TOTALLY confident that you have the skills to do so.

reply

Holy rent-free, Batman.

You may want to delete this.

reply

Nice to know I occupy the thoughts of so many shitlibs on here LOL

reply

This aged well.

reply

It has aged well, actually. The post was still made by patman. RG getting banned is irrelevant.

In fact, this dude is in SO MANY heads(including yours), that this post is nearing 60 replies.

reply

Aged like a fine yogurt.

reply

You're welcome now tell me more about how much you're in love with me

reply

No I'm not necessarily in love with you. I just wanted to know I support your sources.

reply

Is Patman "Patrick" or "Patricia"?

reply

https://youtu.be/ZdV3VomzKdI

reply

Does that one have "Chris" in it?

I never liked those skits. I've worked with "Pat"s and "Chris"'s and interacting with them was just stressful. You always try to be nice to people... Freaks are different things to different people. I don't like talking about guns or UFC, so I guess I'm a freak in a lot of universes...

reply

It started off good but towards the end, I'm feeling much sarcasm.

reply

Funniest part is last time I talked to this poster was a month ago. So I've been living rent free for a month in it's head LOL

reply

I would like to live rent free too.

reply

Keep voting Democrat. You'll be living in bondage, rent free.

reply

This is what I got out of the OP. Is it this πŸ‘πŸ» or is it this? πŸ‘ŽπŸ» πŸ€·πŸΌβ€β™€οΈ Or the whole post could be a pile of πŸ’©!

reply

Well the crybabies won, and he's banned now.

reply

Randall? I hate to see that. When he wasn’t on a tear he did bring some important info. I suggested to him to curb his tongue and I chastised him a few times. But, I’ve seen just as bad from a few lying, profanity laced Democrat lemmings. I noticed if you had a civil tongue with Randall he usually replied in kind. I also noticed he usually was the first one to attack and that’s why I warned him. He most definitely has a profane mouth. I hope the ban is temporary and he will have learned civility.

I became quite upset with him this week when he called an autistic kid trash. It was the kid who destroyed tvs worth thousands of dollars. I suggested the loud audio from the tvs may have sent the kid on a rampage. I sent Randall a link explaining how noise affects people with autism. He replied he didn’t care.

Yes, the crybabies won and MC banned someone who posted links to today’s headlines. πŸ™‡πŸΌβ€β™€οΈ

reply

I'll miss Randall's posts. I had to take him off my ignore list since I couldn't read any of the responses to my covid posts. Randall was on every covid post. He was too stubborn and his replies were sometimes too mean BUT that's not unusual on the politics board.

reply

I cringed many times over his rants. Why didn’t he pay heed to the Mod Squad’s warnings? He didn’t…now he’s banned. The Democrat lemmings on MC will be going into withdrawal. Why? Because their nemesis won’t be around! Who is going to challenge them over their lies? They won’t have Randall to rake over the coals which gave them pleasure. They like to argue for argument's sake!

reply

Banning someone on a chat site like this is like cutting the head off a hydra.

reply

Yup, pretty much.

reply

You called it! Randall wasn’t any worse than some he blasted. They blasted right back with the same. They didn’t like it when he nailed them to the wall by calling them out for their damn lies! Their mouths got just as filthy!

reply

> Randall wasn’t any worse than some he blasted.

That is just not true.

Randal began every comment with a lie or an insult, and ended every comment with a worse insult.
He constantly lied and misconstrued fact, especially about the pandemic, Covid-19 and the vaccine.
To me, on the other side, he stood out as the best example ... of the worst.
If he had any real points there would have been no need for him to be in constant flame mode.
But there are so many Right-wing extremists on this site that is not a big distinction.
I hope this is at least a beginning of cleaning this site up for
* civil movie and tv discussions.
* reasonable political discussion.

To me that mostly depends on the behavior of the Right-wing extremist propagandists. He reaped what he sowed. I am sure there will soon be another new account or an old one that will spring up like the gorgon's heads.

reply

"I hope this is at least a beginning of cleaning this site up for
* civil movie and tv discussions.
* reasonable political discussion."

Don't you have twitter and Facebook for all your group think? Go there if all you want is the establishments version of things.

reply

In other words…pablum! The Democrat lemmings and minions on MC have a hissy fit if you counter them with truths. They can’t handle it so they turn it back on you to make you the villain! Forget about asking them a question or defining an action. Their only recourse is to Deny, Deflect (for which they are the masters), Dismiss, and/or Dumbfound.

BTW, ”Randal began every comment with a lie…”

He did NOT!

BTW, ”He constantly lied and misconstrued fact, especially about the pandemic, Covid-19 and the vaccine.”

He did NOT! You took everything Lord Fauci, the CDC and the government said…”Hook, line and sinker!”

When are you and your ilk going to admit if someone doesn’t agree with you, that makes the person, in your mind a right-wing extremist? Good Grief! I may not agree with a damn word that comes out of your mouth, but it doesn’t make me a right-wing extremist. We all have different opinions and beliefs. So, get over yourself!

reply

You know you're talking to one of the worst on here, right?

reply

To whom to you refer? There are so many my eyes are crossed!

reply

brux.

reply

Thought so, but wanted to be certain. He’s the worst when it comes to denying. Randall posted truthful articles, but akin to Trump he angered people. Instead they would prefer to accuse him of lying instead of researching for themselves. It didn’t matter if what he wrote were truthful facts, it was easier to call him a liar than to admit they were in the wrong. They are so far down that rabbit hole the Dems have dug for them they can only see the sides of the hole, which will one day cave in on them! I hope I live to see the day! πŸ€·πŸΌβ€β™€οΈ

reply

Get over myself for expressing my experience with that account?

That previous post is a completely accurate description of every interaction I had with that account.

Not only that, but when I would read his nasty comments to me, it described most of his attacks on whoever he thought was a Liberal ... and whoever else on this site chronically used the word "shitlibs", and almost always without provocation, as in no recognition, as you say, that people have different opinions and beliefs? Liberals would confront him with facts, and he broke into insults even if he would try to come back with some facts. Those were usually untrue or from some right-wing site like SkyNews.

> I may not agree with a damn word that comes out of your mouth, but it doesn’t make me a right-wing extremist.

And I would never make the case that you were a right-wing extremist unless I had other reasons than that to make it. But your behavior it that post is characteristic of a Right-wing extremist. Why do you accuse me based on RG's interactions? Are you his new account?

> The Democrat lemmings and minions on MC have a hissy fit if you counter them with truths.

You twist around to do the same only worse than you accuse me of, and dismiss my experiences with RG.

What truth is it that I cannot counter? I expressed facts and it was you who denied them - to save the honor or someone who apparently got booted off the site for years of horrible behavior.

reply

[deleted]

I never defended his behavior or his profane tongue. What I did defend were his posts which I researched for myself. It didn’t matter to y’all if he posted something truthful about Covid, the vaccines or whatever you called him a liar. You nit-picked his words. Just this week he was raked over the coals for posting a 3 month old article which was factual. He was accused of lying because something was amiss with the photo. I had to back up his story!

You guys post from liberal rags all the time, but God forbid if we post from Fox News, or from other conservative web sites we are dismissed! The story is dismissed. You and Keelai are 2 of the worst for doing so. Dammit! Check it out before calling us liars. Just as you did with the D'Souza OP. You ignored the whole story.

But, now I’m tired of defending Randall. Lord knows I warned him. I will miss his posts, but not his angry profanity laced diatribes. I quit watching and listening to Trump after the first year. I became tired of cringing! I recall telling a Democrat friend before Covid hit (we didn’t discuss politics) the country was doing good under Trump. People were working again. Black unemployment was the lowest on record. But, darn it! He wouldn’t shut up! He kept putting BOTH feet into his mouth which out weighed the good being done. The media didn’t talk about the good economy, the jobs, etc. All they talked about was how horrible he was as a person. I didn’t like him and I still don’t but dammit he was straightening out the country!

If he had only listened to his advisors, had not turned on those who put him into the Oval Office, kept his mouth shut he would have been re-elected. I believe the first votes he lost was when he trashed John McCain. It was a sorry state of affairs when McCain’s family didn’t want the POTUS to attend the funeral! That was bad, but Trump got what he deserved. Now I wish he would fade away.

I’m done!

reply

You were done before you started.

> You nit-picked his words.

You mean pointed out the meaning of his words and how it did not jibe with the facts? What is wrong with that?

Your metric of the country doing well I believe I fielded in another post, yet you insist.

The country did not do well, and Trump did not do what he said he would do in several glaring areas you are so quick to just ignore.

Bringing jobs and factories back to the USA, and stopping the hemorrhage of jobs and factories. It was all fluff propaganda. Remember Courier A/C? Where is that now, even though many of you use that as a success?

He also said he would have a health care plan, better than ObamaCare, it would cover everyone, be better and cheaper. Remember that "success"?

He said of his tax cut his people were going to hate him and he would have to pay a lot more in taxes. The opposite is what happened. How is it you work full time here on this social network to push that agenda that simply is not true? You get backed into a corner and then go off screaming and insulting. Then you pop up like weed somewhere else saying the same thing.

The first thing is that if you really knew the story behind the elections - since 2000, Republicans have no really won a single one - they were the ones who started rigging the election. First it was storming the precincts to stop the vote count in 2000 FL, and being appointed AGAINST the ultimate vote count that showed Gore won FL, thanks for the Right-Wing stacked Supreme Court.

Then it was voting machine tampering, see the video of Howard Dean's video where he was guided through how to change the votes in a couple of minutes. The first time every in the world where exit polls disagreed so much with the tally results. Then the same voter suppression with Trump, even though he lost the popular vote he also suppressed the votes in Georgia, the same way they did when they denied Stacy Abrams the governorship.

If you are truly anti-establishment you would hate the Republican junta.

reply

Believe what you will, then continue to blather. FYI, The Orlando Sentinel did an actual vote count and Bush did win. I lived in Florida at the time.

You need to do your research before saying the following for which my reply is β€œYou’re full of beans!”

β€œFirst it was storming the precincts to stop the vote count in 2000 FL, and being appointed AGAINST the ultimate vote count that showed Gore won FL, thanks for the Right-Wing stacked Supreme Court.

”The Associated Press reported the findings this way:

AP: A vote-by-vote review of untallied ballots in the 2000 Florida presidential election indicates George W. Bush would have narrowly prevailed in the partial recounts sought by Al Gore, but Gore might have reversed the outcome – by the barest of margins – had he pursued and gained a complete statewide recount.”



The Palm Beach Post put it more dramatically:

”Palm Beach Post: Al Gore was doomed.

He couldn’t have caught George W. Bush even if his two best chances for an official recount had played out.”


https://www.factcheck.org/2008/01/the-florida-recount-of-2000/


reply

See ... the first two lines of the very website you cite ....
Q: When the votes were recounted in Florida, who won the 2000 presidential election?
A: Nobody can say for sure who might have won. A full, official recount of all votes statewide could have gone either way, but one was never conducted.


What you said was just lies. But if anyone, any American takes the time to think about this and analyze it ...

Of course YOUR ESTABLISHMENT media is going to support the election, otherwise it sets the stage for the whole country to blow up, just as Trump is having to do now because the of the growth on Democratic voters. The GOP knew 30 years ago and now every election they have to work harder and harder to cheat the vote, going so far as to put it all on Democrats, where there has not really been much doubt about the validity of the Democratic vote. Excluding Kennedy's election and the vote in Chicago.

If Bush won, why did he have to take it to the Supreme Court where they disregarded the count?

If Bush won why did they not count all the ballots in all the counties and precincts in FL?
If Bush won why did they not follow Florida law and proceed with classifying the ballots and then determining the voter intent?

If Bush won why did the FL Secretary of State have to twist the rules for Bush. Why did they use light paper stock that caused the hanging chads on the ballots where they wanted to lower Democratic count. Why did they go against past ballot setups and lay out a ballot that confused so many people that they needed to examine then to determine the voter intent - and they abort that process.

Bush did not win, but to make that known now breaks completely the image of the US ... like Kennedy being proven to have been assassinated by a conspiracy of Right-wing somebodies.

Republicans are doing very well running with the media and government of lies meme, they have just reversed the true nature of the lies because they MUST, to win.

reply

You didn’t read the whole article. I’m telling you right now the Orlando Sentinel did a thorough recount and Bush won. Not by much, but he won! You don’t know what you’re talking about. I lived it. If you care to read here’s more info. Do I have to shout it hard head?

”Media Recount: Bush Won the 2000 Election”

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/media-jan-june01-recount_04-03

reply

There was not full recount of that election.

Funny how you are so adamant about this FL partisan recount to uphold the election and yet do you support Trump's contention the election was stolen?

reply

Ultimately, a media consortiumβ€”comprising The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Tribune Co. (parent of the Los Angeles Times), Associated Press, CNN, The Palm Beach Post and the St. Petersburg Times[78]β€”hired NORC at the University of Chicago[79] to examine 175,010 ballots collected from the entire state, not just the disputed counties that were recounted; these ballots contained undervotes (ballots with no machine-detected choice made for president) and overvotes (ballots with more than one choice marked). Their goal was to determine the reliability and accuracy of the systems used for the voting process. Based on the NORC review, the media group concluded that if the disputes over all the ballots in question had been resolved by applying statewide any of five standards that would have met Florida's legal standard for recounts, the electoral result would have been reversed and Gore would have won by 60 to 171 votes. (Any analysis of NORC data requires, for each punch ballot, at least two of the three ballot reviewers' codes to agree or instead, for all three to agree.) For all undervotes and overvotes statewide, these five standards are:[7][80][81]
Prevailing standard – accepts at least one detached corner of a chad and all affirmative marks on optical scan ballots.
County-by-county standard – applies each county's own standards independently.
Two-corner standard – accepts at least two detached corners of a chad and all affirmative marks on optical scan ballots.
Most restrictive standard – accepts only so-called perfect ballots that machines somehow missed and did not count, or ballots with unambiguous expressions of voter intent.
Most inclusive standard – applies uniform criteria of "dimple or better" on punch marks and all affirmative marks on optical scan ballots.

reply

Voter suppression became the foundational go-to tactic for the GOP in 2000. Although the GOP attacked Democratic presidential nominee Al Gore with smear and innuendo (ridiculing him for helping write the legislation that created the modern internet, for example), the main thing that got George W. Bush into the White House was voter suppression. His brother, Florida governor Jeb Bush, and Bush’s secretary of state, Katherine Harris, threw somewhere between 20,000 and 90,000 African American voters off the rolls. They were able to get the vote close enough that five Republican appointees to the Supreme Court functionally awarded Bush the presidency. (The BBC covered this in 2001 in two major investigative reports

Hartmann, Thom. The Hidden History of the War on Voting (p. 7). Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Kindle Edition.

reply

"You guys post from liberal rags all the time, but God forbid if we post from Fox News, or from other conservative web sites we are dismissed! The story is dismissed."

I just want to touch on this comment. Fox News is fine. It's biased, just like CNN, but for the most part, they are truthful. RG on the other hand constantly used crackpot conspiracy theory websites that were full of pseudoscience and lies, along with screen shots from Twitter with no context. Those are the sources that were dismissed, as they should be.

Is it really so hard to do a quick fact check to see if the website is credible?

A good example is National File.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/national-file/

reply

I use it frequently. Along with Fact Check, Snopes even though it has a left side. I do my best not to quote from far right sites. There are times a story is only reported at those sites. The left decides not to report the story. It’s a true occurrence, so I keep searching for a middle of the road site.

There were a few times the right took some of Biden’s words out of context during the campaign. I corrected them. Now I couldn’t do that because how can anyone understand Biden? He’s nonsensical and getting worse daily. He truly has a mental problem and he needs to resign. He’s down right pitiful.

reply

A fact-check?! Randall knew what he was posting was lies. kspkap knows too. They don't care about facts, that's why they post trash.

reply

Speak for yourself kuatorisis. I know what I read. I know I fact check. I know what I post. I don’t post trash. I can’t help it if you don’t agree with it.

reply

There she is. Clutching those pearls, feigning offense.

reply

Believe what you will if it makes you happy. You can be as callous as Randall. The others see it but they look aside.

reply

[deleted]

I lost respect for him after he mocked Chadwick Boseman's cancer. He said yeah that Black Panther sequel is doomed wukancer forever lol! Mocking an innocent man's cancer is absolutely disgusting! He was a racist bigot. It burned him up that Black Panther was successful and I know that he is glad Chadwick died of that awful illness. So he got exactly what he deserved. I also lost respect for you when you were standing by him. I am not saying you supported that but I do not care what anyone says after saying those things they lose my support period! The fact that you kspkap claim to be a person of faith is appalling to me that you would stand behind a person of that level of filth.

reply

I agree with everything you said about him disparaging Chadwick Boseman. It was disgusting. But, you seem to miss the fact I did not defend Randall, I never stood by him. I told him so. All I’ve said is I’ll miss the information he posted which I researched for myself.

BTW, I didn’t read everything he posted. If the OP doesn’t interest me I don’t read it. That’s how I missed his postings about Chadwick Boseman. Randall had a foul mouth and a cold heart. I called him out over him calling the autistic kid trash.

But, where is your outrage over others on here who have the same β€œ level of filth”? They are here. Don’t deny it. It’s too bad you aren’t β€œappalled” over their filth. I surmise you stand behind them.

Anyhow, it’s for the best because he wasn’t curbing his tongue. There isn’t any reason for someone to be so callous.

reply

Yes but you were rather chummy with him. Often times you would be laughing at the points he was making. Even if he said truth after mocking that I would not support him after that. You do that garbage by making fun of death and cancer you are dead to me.

Oh yeah and he called the autistic kid trash! Rather disgusting as well. He does not care about hurting people's feelings.

If anyone mocked cancer or anything of the sort I would not associate with them anymore. I denounced the rioting and looting done by BLM. Even though I lean a certain way I do not support hurting innocent people or acts of violence. I am about peaceful protesting. Breaking no laws, and not harming anyone or their property.

I am glad he is gone and do not feel one ounce of sympathy for that trash human being.

reply

β€œ But, where is your outrage over others on here who have the same β€œ level of filth”? They are here. Don’t deny it. It’s too bad you aren’t β€œappalled” over their filth. I surmise you stand behind them.”

reply

I never did deny it. I have actually had several altercations with extremists on the other side. There are toxic people on the other side I openly admit that. Thing is you want to see me ridicule the other side because you have disdain for it. I love that game unless you personally see it you assume I support the other side. Comb through my posts I do not stand behind violence or looting. In fact I have spoken out against it many times.

reply

> Go there if all you want is the establishments version of things.

Fitting the pattern you are. IF ... nonsense. And as we see in the news lately Facebook was hardly pushing the establishment version of thing.

Facebook Documents Show How Platform Fueled Rage Ahead of Jan 6th Attack On Capital
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/10/22/jan-6-capitol-riot-facebook/

Inside Facebook, Jan. 6 violence fueled anger, regret over missed warning signs
A trove of internal documents turned over to the SEC provides new details of the social media platform’s role in fomenting the storming of the U.S. Capitol

That seems to be exactly what you and your buddies try to do here every day.

I don't much think of myself as an Establishment supporter, since the Establishment promotes the right-wing view of things, and puts forth a very weak token attempt that is easy to see through that makes the opposition cause synonymous with the weak and still money driven Democratic party. You are all soldiers in the Establishment party working to stomp the people, often by claiming they are all minorities or criminals or terrorists, when in fact, the biggest terrorist threat we face is Right-Wing Nationalism.

reply

I wouldn’t give you 2 cents for Facebook’s opinion. Facebook is the silencer of truth. It shuts down conservative talk and facts about Covid, the vaccine, etc. Words coming from doctors, scientists, healthcare workers are silenced. Don’t ever quote that lying site to me. Just as I have divorced myself from all things Google. Walmart is also on my hit list!

reply

> It shuts down conservative talk and facts about Covid, the vaccine, etc.

Well again, the facts are ... the numbers from inside Facebook show the opposite to be true.

reply

β€œNever forget the day Trump rode down the escalator in 2015, called for a ban on Muslims entering the US, [and] we determined that it violated our policies, and yet we explicitly overrode the policy and didn’t take the video down,” one wrote bitterly. β€œThere is a straight line that can be drawn from that day to today, one of the darkest days in the history of democracy and self-governance. Would it have made a difference in the end? We can never know, but history will not judge us kindly.”

To this I say horse πŸ’©! Bunch of wussies working for Facebook the silencer of free speech!

The King’s people probably said the same thing after the Boston Tea Party! Not a word though about BLM and their tactics including storming Oklahoma’s capitol. Do you know why? It was to protest a law protecting drivers from the BLM thugs!

https://dailycaller.com/2021/04/22/black-lives-matter-protest-oklahoma-transgender-sports-riots/

reply

> To this I say horse πŸ’©! Bunch of wussies working for Facebook the silencer of free speech!

Just another one you daily deluge of nonsense posts, trying to cover up lies by invoking the 1776 revolution.

Remember when Samuel Johnson said "Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel". Trump hugging the flag, or holding the bible.

Why all the histrionics and dramatics, name-calling, lying, insults?

You want me to condemn BLM when they protest violently ... I do. I never supported that. However at least under the BLM banner there is a germ of a point, that the police in this country use violence far more against non-whites then whites. The proof of that is that in this data-drive computerized world the justice department still does not mandate national reporting of these police events. They have no idea of real crime statistics or complaints of violence by police.

So instead of fixing that, Republicans seek to shut down the teaching of history by stigmatizing something they call CRT, critical race theory, something that has developed over time as a legal framework to ensure that minorities, especially African Americans get a hearing.

Funny how you talk about freedom and justice but the it comes to hearing about reality and testimony you work behind the scenes in devious ways to prevent it.

And then you claim you feel hurt or unfairly treated if I refer to you are Right-wing?

reply

You are as delusional as that keeli character. Yeah you are right the establishment is hardcore rightwing.

reply

Make up your mind .... but keel ?? ... you really know how to hurt a guy

reply

You are fucking delusional. 100% delusional.

He was a top 2 worst person on this site. He posted fake articles (Baldwin article did him in because it was an outright lie), said AWFUL things - like that he liked Halloween Kills because gay people, black people, and "woke" people died: https://moviechat.org/tt10665338/Halloween-Kills/6169dfffc0160423dd13b5ea/Not-great-but-not-terrible-spoilers -and couldn't make one of this wrong points without insulting someone. He's a piece of shit who posted made up articles from fake sites or that he created on his own - and you align yourself with that. Clutch those pearls, you fake ass.

reply

He posted fake articles [...] couldn't make one of this wrong points without insulting someone. [...] posted made up articles from fake sites

I don't see where's the difference with the rest of the 'Politics' board... πŸ€”

reply

If everyone did what he did, we'd all be banned.

reply

Don’t disagree with or cross kuatorises. If you do he can turn into someone akin to Randall. Two sides of the same coin. Just sayin’

reply

” Clutch those pearls, you fake ass.”

And there it is! The filth and the callousness. The same as Randall’s. You give as good as you got from Randall! All high and mighty sitting on that high horse! What a hypocrite you are! Will anyone call you out? Hell no! I would put you right up there with him…a top 3!

Here is the proof you damn filthy mouthed holier than hypocrite:

https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/617079b367acc5165f52737b/Covid-outbreak-on-Royal-Navy-Carrier-despite-all-100-crew-being-double-vaccinated?reply=61707d5967acc5165f52739d

reply

I do not feel bad for that scumbag at all. He mocked Chadwick's Boseman's death and cancer. Real classy guy.

reply

Randall was probably happy he died because he's black. He cheered the death of interracial couple, black people, and a kid dressed a woman in Halloween Kills: https://moviechat.org/tt10665338/Halloween-Kills/6169dfffc0160423dd13b5ea/Not-great-but-not-terrible-spoilers. He's a sick guy.

reply

Wow what an absolute trash human being!

reply

He truly is. There's no defending him at all. I didn't see his Boseman comment, but the guy is so fucking nuts he thinks Halloween Kills is a social commentary against mixed couples, gay people, and "cross dressers" (whose literally a kid just wearing a Halloween costume. He's off-the-charts nuts.

reply

TALKING TO YOURSELF?πŸ€”

reply

Are you saying this is Randal's alt account? :o

reply

QUITE POSSIBLE.

reply

Randall was banned? I am legit surprised and not surprised at the same time. It will be a shame missing his hilarious posts.

reply

Sucks to see people banned, even those as toxic as Randy.

But at times it did seem like he was trying to get banned on purpose.

reply

If by sucks you mean excellent news, sure.

reply

Yeah I suppose it is good for the board overall. I just have mixed feelings about it.

reply

Bye bye Randy πŸ˜ƒπŸ‘‹

reply

Pokey got banned?

reply