biden won, i don't believe he did, but ok, he won, it's worrying.. - Politics Discussion

[–] EpargneGourou (295) 3 years ago

No he didn't win fair and square. He definitely won "the battle" - i.e. Trump didnt have what it takes to stop them stealing it.

But there is no way in hell he actually won the election for real.

In these months that have passed I too have had a few moments where I wondered "maybe he did really win, if so what does that mean about America... are they the stupidest people ever"?

Of course they aren't... over the last 10 years less and less people believe the "mainstream" media.. .every single day people wake up and realise it's a bunch of baloney.

There's no way there were enough self-hating saps for Biden to win.

reply

[–] yatzo376 (7752) 3 years ago

Don’t worry, the cyber ninjas are straightening out this widespread voter fraud nonsense

reply

[–] LokiVariant264 (505) 3 years ago

yaaa the ninjas will def find that Chinese bamboo paper ballots! who else, but a ninja vs the Chinese espionage ninjas. it only makes sense dumb democrats!!!

reply

[–] EpargneGourou (295) 3 years ago

Well, why would they have traces of bamboo on them if they were from Arizona and not China?

Im trying to ask you "what's your point", but obviously you dont have one, if you ever had your first point it would probably kill you on the spot.

reply

[–] LokiVariant264 (505) 3 years ago

Because who says the district or state manufactures their own ballots... where did you get that idea from?

I dont have a point? im sorry my point exposes the crazies in your party are reaching so hard they will believe any and all nut job conspiracies rather than accept the reality that they lost. thats the point.

reply

[–] Bloodworth79 (5736) 3 years ago

Silicon valley is 95% Democrat so they would go to any length to secure the election for Biden. Hiding hunter stories, stating what is fake news and what is real. They control the narrative.

95% or the media, TV, radio, newspaper are Democrat. And they used their power the same.

95% of hollyweird are Democrat , lots of power, money and influence coming from that gang of freaks.

The Democrats have packed the courts and control them. They can decide who to prosecute or simply let walk free. They can toss claims of election fraud in days and let other previous amd similar cases last years.

The Democrats control the FBI, you have text messages of agents speaking about doing all they can to stop trump. Lots of power to be used in that position.

Democrats control college academia where anti American and pro democrat party is heavily pushed

They control elections now

Something wrong with an online voting machine.

Silicon valley will handle the hacking.
The media will report no such possibility.
The courts will throw out any claim
Hollyweird will make fun of such claims.

There is an obvious abuse of power

And the bottom line is those with the power either have no idea to run a country or are purposely and systematically destroying the country

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17818) 3 years ago

And the bottom line is those with the power either have no idea to run a country or are purposely and systematically destroying the country

It's both. They are destroying the country because they are fucking morons and have no clue what to actually do with power once achieved. It's a sad old story, and we know how it ends. (everyone dies)

Look at their leader. Dude can't even walk up stairs, you think they know how to wield power with responsibility?

reply

[–] Bloodworth79 (5736) 3 years ago

Imagine inventing Facebook,
Amazon or Twitter....literally young people who got lucky they got into silicon valley early on with a somewhat simple idea

And the power and money that came along with that was too much.

You now have these people who can control aspects of the news and elections just because they struck gold with their business

reply

[–] EpargneGourou (295) 3 years ago

And they're here to take out their anger and rage on us, from how much they got bullied at high school.

reply

[–] LokiVariant264 (505) 3 years ago

so you have evidence he didnt? court cases ruling in favour or mass voter fraud? evidence that the numbers were changed ect please take your lies elsewhere kid. remember when you ran when I disproved your nonsense about vaccines :)

reply

[–] EpargneGourou (295) 3 years ago

The Supreme Court refused to hear it on the grounds of "No standing" which was ridiculous.

The evidence was never presented in the highest court in the land.

Only a moron would say there was nothing suspicious about the US election. A moron or someone who was deliberately trying to be as insane as possible.

Its impossible to argue with a closed mind (although applying the word "mind" to you seems dubious)

No matter what anyone says you're just going to go through life repeating "no evidence" to yourself like the ditzy three year old cheerleader you are.

reply

[–] LokiVariant264 (505) 3 years ago

theres been 60+ cases. they lost them all.

the evidence in various states and various forms have been presented to various judges, many republicans and many trump appointees. They got laughed out of the room and chastised by the judges for how embarrassingly bad their cases were

"Only a moron would say there was nothing suspicious about the US election. A moron or someone who was deliberately trying to be as insane as possible."

yes such a moron. who demands evidence. extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and when you claim theres a mass election steal PROVIDE EVIDENCE> oh right you cant.

"Its impossible to argue with a closed mind (although applying the word "mind" to you seems dubious)
"

closed mind. aka requires facts and evidence.

notice how you could have provided evidence? and did not. and proceeding to use all the same lines flat earths and covid conspiracy theorists use?

reply

[–] EpargneGourou (295) 3 years ago

theres been 60+ cases. they lost them all.

So there's 60 judges who didn't want to get called "fascist", and preferred to do what the TV told them to.

60 judges who didnt want to get their fat old asses railroaded out of their job (and/or country club)

What does that prove?

Like I said, the evidence was not seen or heard in the highest court in the land.

Even "Supreme"(ly retarded) judges are scared of the Antqueefa mob and scared of being called racist, fascist etc...

reply

[–] LokiVariant264 (505) 3 years ago

"So there's 60 judges who didn't want to get called "fascist", and preferred to do what the TV told them to."

LOL only in your delusional head.

"60 judges who didnt want to get their fat old asses railroaded out of their job (and/or country club)"

hhwhhqhahahah yet again. only in your delusional head

"60 judges who didnt want to get their fat old asses railroaded out of their job (and/or country club)
"

you need to stay off 4chn or reddit. its three posts now and you've had plenty of time. and look at that! no evidence! just more baseless assertions. good job!

reply

[–] joej2923 (3141) 3 years ago

I was wondering if the US would be better with a parliamentary system that allowed for a no confidence vote. I think a parliamentary system would allow for more than two parties to influence policy. The US is stuck in a two-party system and both parties are controlled by big donors.

Trump, Hillary Clinton and Biden are all horrible choices for President. I would have voted for Pence if Trump had been removed but I will never vote for Trump.

There isn't any solid proof that Biden didn't win the election. Due to the winner-take-all system, the Presidential race is determined by six or seven states. Trump is just a poor sport who cannot accept losing.

reply

[–] Bubbathegut (18240) 3 years ago

Still no proof that he won, we need an investigation into voter fraud and collusion.

reply

[–] Lord Rake (4535) 3 years ago

69,498,516 59,948,323 Obama/McCain
65,915,795 60,933,504 Obama/Romney
62,984,828 65,853,514 Trump/Hillary
74,111,000. 81,000,000 Trump/Biden

No one is going to explain how those numbers jumped and remain credible.

reply