MovieChat Forums > Politics > Biden Pledges to Gut Religious Freedom P...

Biden Pledges to Gut Religious Freedom Protections, Saying They Give 'Hate' a 'Safe Harbor'

posted 4 years ago by Satan2016 (25525)
4 replies | jump to latest

Title is misleading, article is all about fake "LGBTQ" rights and acknowledging trans delusions.

https://pjmedia.com/election/tyler-o-neil/2020/10/30/biden-pledges-to-gut-religious-freedom-protections-saying-they-give-hate-a-safe-harbor-n1108379

Indeed, it seems Biden aims to force transgender ideology on the American people.

“I believe every transgender or non-binary person should have the option of selecting ‘X’ as their gender marker on government identifications, passports, and other documentation. I will support state and federal efforts to allow for this accurate representation,” he said (emphasis added).

In other words, Biden claims that transgender identity, not biological sex, is an “accurate” representation, even though biological males do not become female and vice versa. In one particularly tragic case, a pregnant mother who identified as transgender arrived at the hospital in labor. Because her documents falsely listed her as male, the doctors assumed her issue was not pregnancy and her baby died.

Yet the Democrat endorsed transgender identity as “accurate” and seems intent on forcing that ideology throughout the federal government.

Trump required the military to admit soldiers according to their biological sex, not their gender identity. This was not a “ban” on transgender people but an acknowledgment of biological sex, which might be extremely important in the military and in health care, since men and women physiologically react to certain medications differently.

While Joe Biden identifies himself as Roman Catholic and claims to abide by the Greatest Commandment, he would vehemently oppose religious freedom in office.

[–] roto (94) 4 years ago

Intermingling religion and government/form of rule normally doesn't work well in the end. We have more than one example of historical precedence for this.

There is nothing wrong with choosing to practice a religion but it has no place in politics or the rule of society. When a person is stripped of the freedom to acknowledge themselves as they gender they identify as then religion as too much power in a government. When one person feels they can't practice their own religion of choice without feeling hindered by a government's own biased religious identification then religion in government has too much power.

When "The Church" has a say in how citizens are governed, that is NEVER a good thing. Such a thing did not work in the middle ages and it will not work here in America in the modern era.

[–] darkpast (8717) 4 years ago

Great news

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

He's a creepy weirdo. For a man so close to death, he should fear the Lord.

[–] B1cKsurN (17407) 4 years ago

So Islam?

This is probably not a good strategy to go with....