MovieChat Forums > DavidM > Replies
DavidM's Replies
I never thought Igor fell in love with Anora, more that he feels sorry for her.
Does she also insert her fingers into the ass of her lover during their sex scene, as Cerina vincent did in the original?
True, and she fingered his lover's ass haha
The intelligence and ability to foresee every possible contingency were their superpowers, that's the whole point of the movie.
It was calculated, like everything he does since the moment Staple tells him she has ordered to put dozens of cameras around the hospital.
Not at all. It's incredible difficult to do what this movie does, shot with so many actors on location mixing two languages. It's a very good movie.
A good movie isn't just about liking the protagonists.
She explains it in the last scene, don't you remember?
Really? Because you prefer old Catherine over young Catherine, or because You prefer more chelle over Beth?
Did You find it as hot as the original?
Yess! But You would prefer Michelle or the Catherine from The original movie?
In the first days he and Musk are dismantling the corrupt Deep State, which is exactly the purpose I voted them for, so yes, I still think demócrats are the fascists and l AM very happy about voting Republican :)
¿? Who cares what science says, as a work of fiction it has to be coherent with the rules of the fantasy world it creates, and Nolan made a great and beautiful work creating that world, even if it's certainly impossible that an inverted subject interacts with a non inverted one. But in the depresdive current state of Hollywood, s blockbuster like this is a true gift.
Have you seen the videos of that channel? You will see that not at all, he thought about the rules of time inversion veeeery well.
Totally agree. It's a flawed movie, but I'm glad it exists, just for the fact it creates a new kind of time travel I couldn't even conceive in my mind.
Thanks, although I agree with him that a fight between an inverted and non-inverted subjects is beyond any logic, a total paradox. I even read Nolan's script, but it doesn't add much clarity hehe
They have sense, but you have to understand first the rules of temporal inversion. As they say in the movie, you have to stop thinking in linear terms. if you want to understand the inversion of Tenet I recommend you very much this Youtube channel that explains every scene with 3D graphics:
https://www.youtube.com/@WelbyCoffeeSpill
Also, I made my own video video summarizing all the movie, hope you like it too hehe:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRwuBWjmMEY&t=1s&ab_channel=FOTOGRAMASOCULTOS
This saga is like a mindless torture porn version of Halloween for sadists, respect for Damien Leone for doing it without any production company behind but artistically are crap.
No, the theory is the non-inverted bullet pierces the head of dead inverted Neil in the moment he rises from the dead from the regular perspective of time, unpiercing his head, but gets stuck in the helmet. Then, in regular time, Neil goes backward and the bullet falls to the ground.
About the non-lethal injuries, the movie shows in Freeport that non inverted TP stabs inverted TP with a knife, sending the injury to inverted TP past, so when they are in the cargo going back in time he starts feeling the injury, which gets bigger until non inverted TP, from the inverted perspective of time, unstabs him and makes the injury dissapear. That was a non serious injury so it goes to the past of the inverted subject, but the movie shows that lethal or at least more serious injuries always goes to the future of the subject, like the death of inverted Neil or when inverted Sator shots non inverted Kat with a inverted bullet in Tallin.
Nolan made up a crazy and counterintuitive new kind of time travel, but to his credit he did a good job showing the rules of it, although I think it needed a sequel to further explore this universe, something sadly I think will never happen, so I am afraid we will never see this time inversion again.
Who is the president of USA now? Can you say it, I am all ears :)