MovieChat Forums > RedCar234
RedCar234 (13)
Posts
Replies
Nope
Nothing in Bojack Horseman makes sense. Cyborgs are humans with robot parts. Mutants can be anything. Xenos is not a consistent term. Anthros are not people, they are animals. And magical creatures, well that can depend which creature.
Roger and Jessica are toons.
Also that quote is cringe and misleading. Also it does not matter if its anthro or not, its still zoophilia. And mutant is not a specific term. Alien is not specific either. Your logic and standards are flawed.
There is no way Denise can be Margaret's bio dad because 1) Humans cannot breed with Cardinalds and 2) if they could the result with be monstrous.
And as for the aliens, it depends on the alien in question. If its an alien that looks biologically and physiologically like humans (Examples; Kryptonians and Tamaranians) then its not beastiality, otherwise it is regardless of their intelligence.
Mutants depends on weather the mutant was once a human or not.
As for the gargoyles. Well the gargoyles from the Wyvern clan looked like humans with reptilian features so its ok.
Jessica and Roger are toons. Toons do not need to make sense. Heck there was even a Toon baby smoking in the film.
Furries are disgusting and cringe.
As for Cheetah well it depends. It some versions she is depicted as human with animal features while in others she is depicted as an anthro cheetah.
In Beauty and the Beats the beast was actually a human.
"Minerva mink and Mayers Jr works because their mammals". yeah that's not how biology works. Only species that are part of the same genus can crosbreed and mate. Minks are not even primates so nope.
"a person
should have that right to love whoever they want to love as the artist or writer thinks so and i support it in interspecies romance even of humans with alien beings/humanoid beings/mutants etc."
Yeah no. In love there are exceptions. And if in the interspecies romance the creature is not a member of the homo genus, if does not look physiologically and biologically like humans. Then that interspecies romance=beastiality.
And that quote you said was cringe and came from an overrated movie with many flaws. I do not know how is your favorite but if it is then your cringe.
It does not matter if its anthro or not. If its a non human animal its still beastiality. Biologically incompatible, incompatible genitalia, exchange of zoonotic diseases, the fact that they might end up destroying each other due to their different physiology. It just doe snot work. Not to mention the psychological side of this.
Ok
Yup
It does not matter if it can consent or not. If its a non human animal its still beastiality. Biologically incompatible, incompatible genitalia, exchange of zoonotic diseases, the fact that they might end up destroying each other due to their different physiology. It just does not work. Not to mention the psychological side of this.
It does not matter if it can consent or not. If its a non human animal its still beastiality. Biologically incompatible, incompatible genitalia, exchange of zoonotic diseases, the fact that they might end up destroying each other due to their different physiology. It just does not work. Not to mention the psychological side of this.
Adopting a child is not the same as having a relationship.
It does not matter if its humanoid. its still an animal so its still beastiality and its messed up in many levels. I guess it does not matter in Regular Show as its fictional and nothing makes sense there but still.
View all replies >