MovieChat Forums > beermonkey70 > Replies
beermonkey70's Replies
seeing characters speak English for no reason is irritating
just watched it again and am convinced Hellstrom never bought the Piz Palu thing. He joined them at the table and got the game going to confirm his suspicions waiting for Hicoz to give himself away somehow
Likely the whole Basterds plan was moot since Marcel and Shoshanna were successful in their separate plot burning the cinema down. They just made it a little more certain
first choice was Adam Sandler surely could have done better than Eli Roth
How are they gonna claim entertainers should stay in their line and then have Hulk Hogan speak at their convention?
one of these HAS to be true
1. Hillary Clinton was convicted by a jury of her peers and I somehow missed the news
2. You are a hypocrite
which
Hulk Hogan has entered the chat
...from the party of "LOCK HER UP"
technically Kurt Cobain did
might be a good next project for Larry David.
yea gotta move the goalpost there.
Most shows are behind a paywall these days.
So the new claim is that you can't make a show like that unless its on a streaming service which is where most shows are these days any way. Got it
except Curb Your Enthusiasm exists..
should have added the scene from the Breakfast Club
never heard of that one
Ted - Mary is his wife in real life as well. On the show they split up and he dated Cheryl who is almost 20 years younger and smoking hot.
Larry - The only one that fits the "average to ugly" range is tracy ullman and he is only dating her to get her to reverse the fence law
Jeff - Rich but not famous. He's married to Susie but they got married young and it seems he would divorce her but doesn't want to give her half his stuff so he cheats instead. The women he hooks are sometimes in the the "average to ugly" range for sure.
Then there's Richard Lewis who constantly dates women way younger and way out of his league
" a virus so lethal you need a test in order to know if you've got it or not."
like HIV?
Ted Nugent lyrics
I've got no inhibitions
So keep your keys out of your ignition
I steal a car like I got the curse
I can't resist the old lady's purse
Jailbait you look so good to me
Jailbait won't you set me free
Jailbait you look fine fine fine
I know I've got to have you in a matter of time
[b]Well I don't care if you're just thirteen[/b]
You look too good to be true
I just know that you're probably clean
There's one lil' thing I got do to you
Jailbait you look so good to me
Jailbait won't you set me free
Jailbait you look fine fine fine
I know I've got to have you in a matter of time
So tell your mama that I'm back in town
She likes us boys when it's time to get down
She's got this craving for the underage
I just might be your mama's brand new rage
Jailbait you look so good to me
Jailbait won't you set me free
Jailbait you look fine fine fine
I know I got to have you in a matter of time
Honey you you you look so nice
She's young she's tender
Won't you please surrender
She's so fine she's mine
All the time, all mine mine
It's all right baby
It's quite all right I asked your mama
Wait a minute officer
Don't put those handcuffs on me
Put them on her and I'll share her with you
500 square miles is more realistic.
The DOJ will surely file a motion to recuse and they should easily win that.
I don't think anyone would deny that there are some teachers that do or say things that are inappropriate. In even more extreme cases, there are many cases where teachers have relations with students. The linked video shows an example.
If a teacher acts inappropriately they should be handled (terminated / suspended, whatever fits the case)
We dont need laws that restrict free speech in order to handle these outliers.
Regarding CRT. The "ideas" you mention are not actually "CRT" but rather a very poor interpretation of the subject meant to enrage the Fox News crowd. However that is neither here nor there. This is about free speech. You dont agree with something so you want to restrict the free speech of teachers.
In my HS days I recall a number of history teachers that mentioned alternative opinions on topics like the JFK assassination. This is free speech. I didnt always agree with their opinions but as long as they are doing their job we dont need laws restricting their speech.
Don't care about whether they are "having it both ways" I prefer freedom. Some sites are shitty but that is their right to be shitty.
Having responsibility for content and choosing how to moderate content are two separate things. If we eliminated sec 230 , and made sites responsible for content then the most of the internet would not be a "free speech" zone. Most site dont have the revenue to invest in reviewing ALL content for potential liability. Most sites would shut down all user generated content. The big sites that did allow user generated content would be very restrictive as what would be allowed to be public.