MovieChat Forums > MovieFhan > Replies
MovieFhan's Replies
He seems to be acting about 28.
I can't get passed the shitty characters and awful lines. That killed it for me. Actually rather than it being a great cast. I think everyone in it was MISCAST.
It probably be better with a whole new cast.
Sorry but I loved Sean's father Jon, but Sean cannot act to save his life. I am still wondering why he was chosen to be in this movie.
Unless he did it for peanuts. But why was his character so retarded in his behaviour and speech? Yeah NASA scientists do have a sense of humor, BUT their vast intelligence still shines through. But this guy gave the impression he'd have trouble adding 2 and 2 together.
WHY have characters like this in a space movie?????????????????????????
Baffling. I also never finished the movie. It just sucked from the start.
I've got a good point though, don't you think.
I didn't like 1990s IT and it looks like this sucks too. I can't understand why they'd make a horror movie about kids for adults.
I wanna see adult horror movies. Not kids horror movies.
Who'd want to eat fish that had been violently poisoned????
There appeared to be a much older man trying to bed a much younger woman in the Creature from the Black Lagoon sequel in 1955, Revenge of the Creature. John Agar was 12 years older than Lori Nelson but he looked a lot older than her.
Yeah good quality, stories and acting. No filler episodes.
It's dated that's for sure.
What embargo?
Most modern horror sucks. Often the story is non existent, awful dialogue, and the acting really bad.
It confuses me why modern horror is like that. Is it laziness? Is it stupidity? Is it lack of talent? I find it staggering just how many crap movies get massive funding and go into production when they're absolute trash.
Often the only way to reply to a thread on here is to reply to the last person who left a message, which can confuse the last person to leave a message into thinking the message left by the last person was for them. IF that makes sense!!!!!
He does look in his 50s, though, but you're right she was only 14 years younger.
I just get fed up of seeing middle aged guys pretending thy're in their late 20s or early 30s. There would have been no problem getting a much younger actor to be the hero in this movie.
Thanks for your reply.
I think he was talking about the OP who only watched an hour.
I didn't enjoy it. I wanted so much more to happen. An explanation, a proper ending. For me it was a lazy uneventful movie.
And I went into it after reading all the GOOD reviews.
Well said, Pooterman.
In four words, 'it sucks; don't bother'.
The 2004 version lacked the atmosphere of the 1979 tv movie. Also Barlow was really scary in the 1979 version. The vampires overall and the kids at the windows were very scary.
I've never read the book but the tv movie was awesome.
If you recall Susan went to the house, stood there looking at it, then was going to get back into the car but she saw Mark going into the house, so she followed him, because she was concerned for his welfare.