MovieChat Forums > cyguration > Replies
cyguration's Replies
<blockquote>And you keep ignoring that some European nations have changed policy on immigration. Why do you keep doing this?</blockquote>
Because we're seeing the evil that these leaders have adopted play out in real time:
https://www.the-star.co.ke/news/world/2024-08-06-new-rioting-across-uk-cities-as-arrests-multiply/
<blockquote>Why do you assume that only married people are in relationships?</blockquote>
Because that's the only way to properly raise a healthy family. No functioning society can be raised without a nuclear family.
<blockquote>if it doesn't do that, it should be banned?</blockquote>
It should be surveyed.
<blockquote>You have zero evidence for such hateful misogynistic bile. </blockquote>
https://www.noticer.news/ideology-gap-young-women-more-liberal-men-more-conservative/
Checkmate.
<blockquote>You literally want the state the smash down the doors of women and arrest them purely for expressing their opinion.</blockquote>
Nope.
<blockquote>Should the state ban me from expressing myself on issues related to that?</blockquote>
Nope.
<blockquote>If so, do they also have the right to physically assault non-white people in Ireland?</blockquote>
They have the right to defend themselves, and their homeland, when and where necessary.
<blockquote>Many states in the USA that were not blue also had high crime rates. Why is this?</blockquote>
Only in the poor and minority-filled areas.
<blockquote>You would be as unwelcome as an Islamist. </blockquote>
Hahaha.... no, all of us who are tired of the globalists are finally taking action and many Irish and Britons hold my views quite dearly, as evident by the protests and riots.
<blockquote>You again assume motive completely baseless.</blockquote>
Consequences corroborate motive. They have had more than a decade to course correct and have purposely not done so. Why is that?
<blockquote>Not being married doesn't mean you're not having relationships, genius.</blockquote>
That's typically how families are formed, ace.
<blockquote>Good grief. Get a fucking life.</blockquote>
The truth is still a checkmate, ace.
<blockquote>Should women be allowed to be performers in black or death metal bands?</blockquote>
If it's to help raise national ethnic pride and patriotism, sure.
<blockquote>So you also think women should further be banned from even arguing they should be allowed to hold office, or allowed to vote?</blockquote>
They should. They vote based on emotion rather than policy; and never for the collective good of man, only for selfish wants.
<blockquote>So you are outright openly in favour of rioting, vandalism and theft. </blockquote>
I am for exercising civil disobedience in favour of native cultural protectionism.
<blockquote>You think it's impossible for a fascist state to arrest people based on false, or trumped up charges? Or that they may have unjustifiable laws that justify resistance? </blockquote>
That's why there should be thorough investigations. Solves all the problems.
<blockquote>You're only focusing on the crime levels in blue states and ignoring that there are also red states there. </blockquote>
That's because gun violence is no where near as high in red states with open-carry laws. Have you ever stopped and asked why?
<blockquote>It's just immigration policies, some of which are more lax or less lax than others.</blockquote>
Immigration as a means of domestic demographic compensation is replacement by any other name.
<blockquote>Majority of them will go onto having heterosexual relationships.</blockquote>
Not according to the steady decline of marriage rates, and by proxy birthrates:
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2024/jan/25/proportion-of-married-people-in-england-and-wales-falls-below-50-for-first-time
<blockquote>How did Pokemon Go go woke exactly?</blockquote>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okJTAlyR0Ys
<blockquote>And what about death metal?</blockquote>
A lot of it -- especially in Sweden, Norway, Russia and Switzerland -- is tied to national ethic pride, which can be good for encouraging patriotism.
<blockquote>So you think women should be banned from being elected politicians</blockquote>
Sure. Since they have become elected, we have steadily been moving backwards in terms of infrastructural progress.
<blockquote>What do you mean by "public broadcasts"?</blockquote>
Electronic billboards or news alerts -- as a means of public shaming or bullying. A socially responsible corrective measure, like a scarlet letter.
<blockquote>You have just admitted that you don't give a fuck about BLMs tactics, you only don't like their motives</blockquote>
Motives and tactics. The Irish are trying to preserve -- some extreme tactics may be required when their civil servants have betrayed the sovereignty of the nation. BLM is simply trying to tear down Western standards for no good gain of broader society. A better question is -- are you fine with losing the modern amenities you enjoy in your current social standing and are you okay with living in complete anarchy, with no protection, at the whim of racists who hate you?
<blockquote>I will await evidence that there is a plan to specific deliberately alter all of the EUs demographics.</blockquote>
The demographic replacement is evidence.
<blockquote>It is not their fault that straight people refuse to have kids.</blockquote>
They are contributing to it. 25% of Gen Z identifying as alphabet contributes to lower birthrates, since they're joining a community with no genetic future.
<blockquote>What? What do you mean "productive lifestyles"? Pokemon? Mobile Suit Gundam?</blockquote>
Before Pokemon Go went woke, it encouraged kids to go outside and get exercise. That is very productive.
<blockquote>Let me get more specific: death metal, dystopian fiction. Do they improve the "excellence of man"?</blockquote>
It can; dystopian fiction can help open people's eyes to avoid that future rather than embrace it, like Harlan Ellison's I have no Mouth and I must Scream, or The Matrix, or Brave New World. It encourages man to be excellent to avoid such outcomes.
<blockquote>Meaning, what, in practice?</blockquote>
Voting, birth control, and holding office.
<blockquote>What form would the "public shaming take"?</blockquote>
Shunning or public broadcasts.
<blockquote>You just want to be the boot.</blockquote>
Every civilisation has had a boot, it just depends on if it is righteous or not.
<blockquote>If the Irish people doing that were in fact antifa, or BLM, you would be condemning them with ease.</blockquote>
Because the Irish are trying to preserve, Antifa/BLM are trying to tear down. Big difference.
<blockquote>A policy failure is not a motive to deliberately try and change continents demographics.</blockquote>
That's exactly what happened. And in that regard, it was not a failure, but went according to plan.
<blockquote>it's not the gay communities fault that straight people are not choosing to have kids.</blockquote>
It is their fault for being genetic dead-ends, though. It's a community with no future.
<blockquote>How do you know none of it has any LGBT characters in it?</blockquote>
The main focus on the top-selling properties are on productive lifestyles.
<blockquote>Does rock music "improve the excellence of man"?</blockquote>
Yes.
<blockquote> Does abstract art "improve the excellence of man"?</blockquote>
Yes.
<blockquote> Does Superhero fiction "improve the excellence of man"? </blockquote>
Yes.
<blockquote>What are feminist positions that should be banned? </blockquote>
All of them.
<blockquote>But you claimed irreligiosity causes crime.</blockquote>
Non-religious, non-homogeneity absolutely results in more crime.
<blockquote>Why are you misrepresenting it?</blockquote>
I'm not cherrypicking, like you.
<blockquote>Yet much of the crime you refer to in Europe is coming from RELIGIOUS groups.</blockquote>
Barbarians operating under the veil of religion.
<blockquote>And what would "have to be done" to stop them?</blockquote>
Public shaming/reproach; then jail.
<blockquote>You think it was acceptable for those rioters to start fires, smash buildings and cars?</blockquote>
Of course not. But in Ireland's case they are protecting their home from invaders.
<blockquote>So you have no evidence then. It's just a claim of motive.</blockquote>
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3666511/Merkel-s-open-door-policy-caused-Britain-leave-EU-German-leader-blamed-Brexit-failure-deal-migrant-crisis-open-arms-immigration-policy.html
<blockquote>No, they don't compensate for birth rate declines</blockquote>
Checkmate.
<blockquote>There are many sexual animes around. And many of those titles are violent.</blockquote>
The top-selling content is not LGBT content, which is good.
<blockquote>Not what I asked you. </blockquote>
Doesn't matter. If it doesn't improve the excellence of man, it shouldn't exist.
<blockquote>Why is this?</blockquote>
You just named high-trust, racially homogeneous societies. That's why.
<blockquote>The top 10 is full of red states. </blockquote>
Colorado, Maryland, Michigan, and Missouri show otherwise.
<blockquote>I thought a lack of religion leads to crime.</blockquote>
In racially diverse regions, absolutely.
<blockquote>You've said that should be illegal. How would they be stopped?</blockquote>
They can hold the position, but if they're sharing it with the intent of subversion, then something would have to be done.
<blockquote>What is it they should have been allowed to do to "protect their culture"?</blockquote>
Everything.
<blockquote>And I'll await evidence that it is German policy, specifically, to replace their natives with Muslims.</blockquote>
Doesn't have to policy, just action/inaction that lead to events like this:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/cologne-new-year-s-eve-mass-sex-attacks-leaked-document-a7130476.html
<blockquote>And yes, gay people CAN procreate via sperm donation, surrogacy or they can adopt.</blockquote>
Adoption rates do not compensate for birth rate declines. As stated, that community brings nothing positive to society.
<blockquote>With all due respect, how in the fuck would you even pretend to know this?</blockquote>
https://comicbook.com/anime/news/best-manga-sales-2023/
<blockquote>Meaning what, exactly? </blockquote>
How has it improved the burgeoning progress of man's excellence?
<blockquote>Based on zero evidence whatsoever, as usual.</blockquote>
https://ifstudies.org/blog/why-are-liberals-less-happy-than-conservatives
<blockquote>Many of the safer cities are in blue states.</blockquote>
Most of these are in blue states:
https://www.populationu.com/gen/most-dangerous-cities-in-the-us
<blockquote>In your world the police fascist state would be raiding people for expressing pro-feminist positions online. </blockquote>
Never of the sort. Though, it's funny you have to acknowledge the Liberal utopia(s) you defend are engaging in the oppression you accuse me of.
Ironic.
<blockquote>Should the state have let the far-right riot, loot and burn people's properties?</blockquote>
They were not going that far. They simply wanted to protect their culture, as they should. It's their home.
<blockquote>Why don't you move to Russia?</blockquote>
I might.
<blockquote>That has nothing to do with that specific law. </blockquote>
You're right, it's culture-wide identity politics, like I said before.
<blockquote>Gay people existing has nothing to do with straight couples having less, or no children.</blockquote>
Promoting that lifestyle absolutely does, since gays can't procreate.
<blockquote>Anime includes LGBT themed subgenres (yaoi),</blockquote>
And they're rightfully not mainstream -- they are niche subgenres where they belong.
<blockquote>Are you suggesting feminism should be banned?</blockquote>
It should be.
<blockquote> LGBT people? </blockquote>
Of course. But those who identify as Liberals seem to suffer similar issues as well.
<blockquote>Can I see data for this please? </blockquote>
https://vividmaps.com/most-and-least-dangerous-cities-in-america/
<blockquote>What "subservience to the state" are you even on about?</blockquote>
Do you not know about the Labour party? The Tories? The FDP? The ILP? This is what happens when you are not subservient:
https://archive.is/apfGj
https://archive.is/R4MMK
https://archive.is/TVJ8V
<blockquote>No, it sounds like German law which has been a thing for decades</blockquote>
They haven't been dysgenically replacing their natives with Muslims for decades.
<blockquote>And I'll await evidence that countries fell due to homosexuality.</blockquote>
No one said that was the only cause, but this video does a good job of explaining how it contributes to rapid decline:
https://youtu.be/VwbE7DHjkHY
<blockquote>And it simply, by your metrics, does not.</blockquote>
How?
<blockquote>Are you claiming feminism should be banned?</blockquote>
It has produced nothing good for society.
<blockquote>No reason to believe this. </blockquote>
The facts related to their health issues, short lifespan, domestic violence, and mental unwellness are reasons.
<blockquote>Try and impose those values now and you'll cause massive social and political rebellion.</blockquote>
Because most Western nations have been culturally subverted.
<blockquote>London has less crime per capita than most US cities.</blockquote>
It has more crime than most Red states and less crime than most Blue states. Do you know why that is?
<blockquote>Are you saying leftism provides good soft power, and traditionalism/reactionary politics does not?</blockquote>
Leftism is about indoctrination and burying truth under hedonistic subservience to the State.
<blockquote>That's shitty law. </blockquote>
And it proves my point about it being weaponised based on identity politics.
<blockquote>I'll await evidence that Austro-Hungary "embraced homosexuality"</blockquote>
War and famine are completely different from societal decay. Many nations fell to war.
<blockquote>The person who initially accused me has deleted their account. </blockquote>
Which means anyone could have said anything.
<blockquote>Also, what's your thought on anime and other modern Japanese media exports?</blockquote>
So long as it promotes sound cultural values, I see no problem with it.
<blockquote>What would the actions of a liberal, or socialist, or left-wing be</blockquote>
Trying to infiltrate to subvert, or utilising grassroots subversion like the sexual revolution or feminism.
<blockquote>No reason that it really does. </blockquote>
It does in the same way that promoting tobacco/gambling has a negative effect on society. It's a vice with zero cultural benefits.
<blockquote>What gives this theocratic corporation legitimacy exactly?</blockquote>
Protecting social cohesion.
<blockquote>Most of Europe has less crime per capita than the USA</blockquote>
Not the places with high immigration, secularism, and identity politics run amok. Cologne, ring a bell?
<blockquote>advocating for anarchy?</blockquote>
If you dislike strict structures to maintain peace.
<blockquote>Why does Russia have almost no soft power?</blockquote>
Because it's not full of subversive Leftists.
Most of Europe doesn't. Issues of sectarianism come from Muslims and Hindus and other cultural and religious groups, not natives.
Wrong: https://www.thepublica.com/germany-woman-convicted-of-offending-migrant-gang-rapists-receives-longer-prison-sentence-than-the-rapists/
<blockquote>No evidence that any society has declined due to homosexuality.</blockquote>
Every advanced society in late stage decay began embracing homosexuality.
<blockquote>The "other person" was a troll.</blockquote>
How do I know you're not lying?
<blockquote>What do you mean "high honour" society?</blockquote>
They maintain strong productivity, respect the laws, encourage strong behaviour toward maintaining cultural heritage.
<blockquote>...when saying that?</blockquote>
Look at Western academia, media, education. Completely captured by Leftists.
<blockquote>I will repeat...</blockquote>
None of that has to do with their degenerate lifestyle influences and the degradation effect it has on broader society.
<blockquote>It's essentially a mob.</blockquote>
Only people who hate structure would think this.
<blockquote>No reason to believe crime directly correlates with a decline of religiosity.</blockquote>
It absolutely does, look at places like London, San Francisco, Portland, or New York. Highly secular; lots of crime.
<blockquote>The very state you describe, in itself, justifies resistance. </blockquote>
Only if you advocate for anarchy.
<blockquote>I've actually seen many of the shows I listed to you. You have not.</blockquote>
And yet I'm still right about them.
<blockquote>Racial sectarianism exists all over the world and most of it has nothing to do with contemporary wokism.</blockquote>
In modern Western nations, it absolutely does. Even the Smithsonian disproves your point: https://nmaahc.si.edu/learn/talking-about-race/topics/whiteness
<blockquote>No evidence that any society has declined due to homosexuality.</blockquote>
Prominence of it has always been tied to late stage societal decay.
<blockquote>So can you finally admit that his accusation to me was wrong?</blockquote>
It was based on another person's claim.
<blockquote>I fail to see what you find admirable in Japan besides that anyway, from your perspective.</blockquote>
Limited/anti-immigration, high-honour society, high-productivity, low crime, low/zero tolerance for disrupting social hierarchies.
<blockquote>If I say I'm an atheist, does that somehow "promote" the dissolution of it?</blockquote>
If you're trying to capture institutes and prevailing social norms, absolutely.
<blockquote>LGBT people are..</blockquote>
Prevarication. Everything I listed is true of their culture.
<blockquote>What would be examples of "undermines the constitutionality of the nation"?</blockquote>
What we're seeing happening now in Western nations.
<blockquote>What if people just don't use the state commerce?</blockquote>
The State fails, which is why it's imperative (and incentivised) for the State to serve the people.
<blockquote>No reason to believe crime directly correlates with a decline of religiosity.</blockquote>
It means people aren't being punished accordingly -- homelessness also means fortunate people are not being charitable as outlined in Judeo-Christian principles.
<blockquote>Would it be just for LGBT people to use firearms...</blockquote>
If they're being arrested, then it means they committed a crime.
<blockquote>So why the fuck should I take your observation on western media remotely seen?</blockquote>
Because it's actually correct.
<blockquote>I would not call that woke at all. That's just race-based sectarianism shit.</blockquote>
Racial hierarchies in sectarian politics is literally one of the basis woke propaganda.
<blockquote>No reason to believe this.</blockquote>
History repeats itself.
<blockquote>so is Melton when he accuses me of it, right?</blockquote>
If it actually has no basis.
<blockquote>you should hate them given their shitty fertility rate.</blockquote>
Why would I hate them? They need to course correct by refocusing on patriarchal standards and enforcing home-life incentives for married couples like China.
<blockquote>What is the social hierarchy as you see it?</blockquote>
God, man, woman, child. Husband, wife, family.
<blockquote>No reason to believe that any of these things have anything whatsoever to do with LGBT culture.</blockquote>
It does, since LGBT culture is a dead-end culture with zero societal benefits. It encourages relational decay, degeneracy, and lifestyles that lead to unfulfilling and unhappy states of being.
<blockquote>And could a social democrat or liberal party run for office?</blockquote>
Sure, so long as their tickets don't include anything that undermines the constitutionality of the nation.
<blockquote>But it isn't the "same as laws anywhere"</blockquote>
You'd have many of the same base laws, but with a state commerce to offset government funding. Can't spend what they don't earn.
<blockquote>What would constitute trying to "dissolve the social infrastructure"?</blockquote>
Aforementioned social hierarchies.
<blockquote>No reason to believe this.</blockquote>
Western decay; crime; hookup culture; homelessness and abortions all show otherwise.
<blockquote>And why can't other people use firearms to protect themselves?</blockquote>
They can.
<blockquote>I assume.</blockquote>
Partly, yes.
<blockquote>prejudging TV shows and films that you've never ever watched. </blockquote>
Because my assessments are likely correct.
<blockquote>How are the authorities specifically trying to cause this violence? </blockquote>
Allowing and pushing idpol at the centre of the White farmer massacres is using it to push anarchy and breakdown social cohesion:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11062235/White-people-target-South-Africas-Julius-Malema-warns-impending-violence.html
<blockquote>No-one can predict the future but the potential collapse of society has nothing to do with the existence of gay people, or progressivism.</blockquote>
The prominence of homosexuality is indicative of late stage societal decay.
<blockquote>What are those principles? You haven't even given a working definition of fascist.</blockquote>
I did. I said Japan was fascist-lite, and had the right concepts in place.
<blockquote>It's a complete fiction. Nothing like it has ever existed.</blockquote>
Never said it did; but it also needs to exist.
<blockquote>What could I do that might do that?</blockquote>
Promoting the dissolution of societal hierarchies.
<blockquote>A claim you've still failed to coherently back up at any point</blockquote>
Western society is in societal decay now: failing birth-rates, high crime, high inflation, low job growth. There is no future sustainability if things maintain at their current trajectory.
<blockquote>Are there even elections in your dystopia?</blockquote>
A constitutional democratic republic would mean voting, yes.
<blockquote>How would laws even work in your weird system?</blockquote>
Same as laws anywhere; guns would be used mostly to maintain a high-trust society and keep out interlopers.
<blockquote>What if the liberal and the socialist remain liberals and socialists?</blockquote>
Then they remain as such; so long as they do not try to dissolve the social infrastructure, they would be fine.
<blockquote>So people are never honourable in the west, ever?</blockquote>
Without God? Mostly, no.
<blockquote>And do you only watch military movies?</blockquote>
Nope.
It's not that people are afraid of homosexuals, it's that people are angry about what the broader media is trying to say about homosexuality. Attempting to paint it as a net-positive to society and the sustainability of a civilisation, when in reality the opposite is true.
Homosexuals cannot procreate, only indoctrinate. Yet the show depicts that homosexuals can procreate.
Homosexuals (specifically lesbians) have the highest domestic and physical abuse rates and divorces out of any pairing:
https://wentworthreport.com/2017/01/08/rate-of-domestic-violence-highest-in-lesbian-relationships/
https://archive.is/gqkN8
https://www.friendswoodfamilylaw.com/blog/2021/05/divorce-rate-higher-for-lesbians-than-gay-men/
Homosexuals have the highest rates of depression, suicide, obesity, and health issues due to STDs/STIs:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2530417
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1874216/
https://josephsciambra.com/cdc-high-rates-of-stds-among-gay-men/ (data from CDC report that the CDC removed for obvious reasons)
Basically, there is no upside to promoting homosexuality among the populace in the media. It has no benefits. Yet the Acolyte is treating it like a positive net to society, among every other show that contains homosexual content. Could you imagine if every show promoted heroin as a positive thing? Never showed the downsides to heroin addiction? Never showed the damage and problems it caused? But always promoted it as a net-positive to society? We've seen how that has worked out in places that decriminalised heroin, and surprise-surprise, it wasn't good:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/07/07/portugal-drugs-decriminalization-heroin-crack/
<blockquote>And how is that happening in London? How is that even happening in Cape Town, exactly?</blockquote>
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8847011/South-African-town-braces-racial-violence-farm-killing.html
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/07/06/retailer-kitchen-knife-ban-crime-wave/
<blockquote>And there's no reason to believe this will happen anytime soon</blockquote>
Ha, funny how you switched to "soon"... which is relative to the speed at which the economy collapses.
<blockquote> If I accuse you of being a pedophile, does it come incumbent upon you to disprove my allegation?</blockquote>
Nope, because it's a baseless accusation.
<blockquote>backs up your suggestion that contemporary Japan is fascist.</blockquote>
Didn't say they were fascist, but that they had some principles and culture standards that lends toward it, which is good for protecting their way of life.
<blockquote> Italy had gun rights remotely akin to what the USA does now.</blockquote>
Never said it did.
<blockquote>Who is "they"? What options?</blockquote>
State-entrusted enforcers.
<blockquote>Is that what you're saying? Should I be arrested?</blockquote>
Nope. You can exist. Just don't undermine the constitutionality of the State.
<blockquote>Why would the state functioning as a company feel remotely obliged to impose anti-LGBT moral police on others? </blockquote>
To avoid societal decay.
<blockquote>How would laws even work in your weird system?</blockquote>
Same as they do in gun-advocating nations.
<blockquote>In what way are they being aggressive about it, beyond public promotion campaigns?</blockquote>
They will keep rolling out incentives until they equalise birth rate.
<blockquote>What "good values" to the promote that's unique and never-present in the west?</blockquote>
Honourable behaviour.
<blockquote>Name the slop in the shows I listed there please.</blockquote>
Too many to list, but any that have pro-LGBT propaganda would count.
Actually... you're right. That also makes a lot of sense given that Luke was uncorrupted like Anakin.
And yeah, definitely poetic justice.
<blockquote>What is going in Cape Town doesn't have anything to do with the UK or USA.</blockquote>
They're using identity politics to push anarchy and the breakdown of social cohesion.
<blockquote>two briefly chaotically led an-con communes is somehow the trajectory of western politics?</blockquote>
That's literally what the West will look like once infrastructure collapses.
<blockquote>And how would I do that?</blockquote>
You're the one who is making the claim.
<blockquote>They literally have freedom of press and a multiparty democracy.</blockquote>
Fascism doesn't necessitate the lack of press.
<blockquote>This says the opposite of what you claimed. </blockquote>
No, it says it's complicated.
<blockquote>You suggested that Fascist Italy had gun liberties.</blockquote>
They had options to safeguard the State.
<blockquote>protect liberals and socialists from being arrested by the state?</blockquote>
People undermining the State are enemies of the State.
<blockquote>The state does and then hands out the profits to its rent-a-thugs?</blockquote>
You can have both state commerce and corporate commerce.
<blockquote>You support that?</blockquote>
Shaming and pillory is good enough.
<blockquote>At this point what civil liberties are firearms een there to protect?</blockquote>
To live a happy, healthy life for those willing to be productive and maintain their lineage.
<blockquote>What's the difference?</blockquote>
China is being much more aggressive toward heterosexual relationships, and it is paying off:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-68552103
<blockquote>Can I accuse you being a pedophile...</blockquote>
Based on what?
<blockquote>and one that is not?</blockquote>
Intent.
<blockquote>Why should I assume they are better than all western film and TV content combined?</blockquote>
They promote good values, social cohesion, and a structured societal future.
It's made pretty clear that he should not have been; but the Force used Anakin as a balance despite him being created for nefarious purposes. He was basically the universe bringing things back into balance after people tried to bring it out of balance.
<blockquote>There's no reason to think this trajectory is inevitable. </blockquote>
The CHAZ and CHOP zones showed it to be inevitable. The current dissolution of order in New York, London, Paris, Cape Town, Johannesburg, and San Francisco show it to inevitable.
<blockquote>Then can you say "Melton is wrong"?</blockquote>
As soon as you can prove he unequivocally lied.
<blockquote>That's not the standard definition of fascism.</blockquote>
It varies per application. Not all of them have to be autocratic to the point of despotism.
<blockquote>Any evidence for this?</blockquote>
https://intellectualtakeout.org/2019/03/after-100-years-mussolinis-fascist-party-is-a-reminder-of-the-fragility-of-freedom/
https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/mussolini-and-gun-control.712291/#post-8862916
<blockquote>How does this work? What is the state selling?</blockquote>
Food, clothes, weapons, paraphernalia, air time on terrestrial broadcasts, etc; it would pay the wages of the prefects.
<blockquote>Your state persecutes them. </blockquote>
Not at all. One of the safest places to live were in fascists states... so long as you behaved.
<blockquote>Yes they are. Any government can pass a law.</blockquote>
Any government can, but they are not. Also, incentives aren't laws.
<blockquote>Prove what?</blockquote>
Melton is a liar.
<blockquote>Are two gay people in the street kissing doing "propaganda"?</blockquote>
If it's used as a way to promote the lifestyle, yes.
<blockquote>are all bad shows?</blockquote>
I'm sure a fair bit of them are bad; but they have plenty of slop in there doing nothing but pushing agitprop.
<blockquote>And what epic media is Russia putting out that beats them exactly?</blockquote>
• Rhez
• T-34
• Panfilov's 28 Men
• Spacewalk
• Blackout
• August 8
• Furious