I don't hate the show. Not blown away either. I was definitely underwhelmed by the first 2 episodes. But genuinely enjoyed the third episode. Things are definitely picking up & I'm really really intrigued by the mystery.
But the critics got an advance viewing of the first 3 episodes & the way they reviewed them made seem like it's this AMAZING, brilliant piece of television that should be celebrated.
i think you're not really accurately representing the critical response.
the metacritic score is 76, and the average critic rating on rotten tomatoes is 7.84.
those are both good, solid ratings, but they're not the kind of scores that suggest critics were ululating uncontrollably in their praise.
it's true the show has a 95% rating on rt, but that shows again imo that the tomato-meter rating really doesn't give the best indication of how critics feel about a movie.
you can have a lot of critics who think a show or film is just fine, will give it a nice solid but not rapturous rating, and that will translate into a rt score in the mid 90s. that shouldn't be used to suggest critics think the film/show is a+ material.
i really enjoy the show myself, and am very interested to see where it will go.
That was one of my thoughts too. About the nostalgia, I mean. The sitcoms that they're homaging & stuff were way way before my time. So, I don't really have an appreciation for them.
Also, I'm not really a huge sitcom person in the first place.
TV Critics are even more useless than Film Critics. I mean all the CW Super Shows have like 80% to 90% on RT. And all those shows are horribly written and the acting isn't much better. This show so far is better than that. But its not exactly the Citizen Kane of TV Show Either.