MovieChat Forums > Unplanned (2019) Discussion > Ban on abortions after 1st heartbeat sen...

Ban on abortions after 1st heartbeat sent to Ohio governor


No topic seemed off limits, including tales of back alleys and coat hangers, as abortion-rights supporters in Ohio fought perhaps the last battle over a twice-vetoed heartbeat abortion ban, which Gov. Mike DeWine has said he will sign.

After nearly 10 years of fighting, Democrats let loose during run-up to final House and Senate approval Wednesday with lessons from slavery, predictions of economic harm, references to the book of Genesis, and testimonials about their own rapes. Faith groups brandished banners and made pleas for religious tolerance. An advocate for reproductive rights threatened Republicans with the loss of young voters' support in 2020.

North Dakota becomes 3rd state to ban abortion

Ohio's closely divided politics have slowed the progress of the so-called heartbeat bill as it has caught momentum elsewhere , forcing years of debate in the state where the movement originated.

Five other states have now passed similar bans, two of which have been blocked by the courts. Republican Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, who took office in January, has said he will sign the bill, after former GOP Gov. John Kasich vetoed it twice.

State Rep. Michele Lepore-Hagan, a Democrat from a storied Youngstown political family, shed tears during the debate, exasperated at a bill she said would harm Ohio and its future.

"I'm concerned that we will have companies that will choose not to locate here due to our oppressive laws. I'm concerned that doctors will leave the state of Ohio," she said. "I'm concerned that our kids are going to leave, that we're going to lose a large amount of young people who don't want to live in an oppressive atmosphere."

Opponents' protests did nothing to budge a largely closed-mouthed GOP majority on the committee. They appeared confident that prohibiting pregnancy termination once a fetal heartbeat is detected is the best thing for the unborn, for women and for the state. Republicans dominated an 11-7 party-line vote that sent the bill to the full House, where it's scheduled for a vote Wednesday.

State Rep. Candice Keller, a Middletown Republican, called the legislation "the most compassionate bill we've ever passed."

Keller rejected suggestions that everyone knows someone who has had, or will need, an abortion; that women will continue to have abortions, only unsafely; even that reproductive rights are about women rather than the men who impregnate them and the male doctors who abort those pregnancies.

"If we are really about empowering the women of Ohio and empowering the women of this country, we will begin to tell the truth about the abortion industry and the enormous amount of profit that is made on the backs of women," she said.

During floor debate Wednesday, two female representatives who said they had been raped, slammed the bill for not making exceptions for rape and incest. Another female lawmaker said her great-grandmother bled to death in a bath tub trying self-administer an abortion.

House Health Committee Chairman Derek Merrin criticized those who say abortion drives down health care costs.

His conscience, he said, tells him abortion is wrong.

"My heart, Mr. Speaker, tells me it's wrong. My understanding of the law and of the constitution tells me it's wrong. And in the spirit of fairness, equality, and justice, I know it's wrong," Merrin said.

Prohibiting abortions at the first detectable heartbeat means prohibiting virtually all abortions, said Dr. Michael Cackovic, a specialist in maternal fetal medicine at Ohio State University Medical Center. He said current standard practice, which involves transvaginal ultrasound, can reliably detect a heartbeat five to six weeks into pregnancy.

"Essentially, that's three to four weeks after conception, or one to two weeks after a missed period," he said.

Cackovic said the heartbeat prohibition would require women who want an abortion to determine they're pregnant using an over-the-counter pregnancy test and to race to have the procedure between four and five weeks into pregnancy.

"You're going to be doing more procedures and subjecting women to more procedures and medications to get abortions, because they're rushing between that four and five weeks to get it accomplished," he said. About a third of all pregnancies end in miscarriage, he said, so the law also would force many women who don't want to be pregnant to get abortions needlessly, when they might naturally have miscarried.

State Rep. Beth Liston, a Dublin Democrat and a pediatrician, said proponents' hopes of challenging the viability standard upheld in the 1973 Roe vs. Wade decision aren't grounded in science. She said she favors the idea from Genesis that breath begins life.

"Simply put, you need lungs and a brain to live, and there's no technology in the world that will change that," she said.

The House's 56-39 vote sent the bill to the Ohio Senate, which agreed to House changes 18-13 before sending the bill to DeWine, a Republican who took office in January.

reply

Oh, my. "...tales of back alleys and coat hangers...." Takes me back to the days when abortion wasn't considered part of the Bill of Rights, and we were still hotly debating it. To hear the pro-abortion people talk, rich women were being chauffeured --bumper to bumper -- to sparkling clinics where abortion was legal; meanwhile, impoverished women were being kicked out of cars -- again, bumper to bumper -- into back alleys where garbage cans were recepticals. Either that or the poor women were dying on their bathroom floors, a coat hanger by her side. And yet for all the demand (the implication was that eventually we'd wind up in one place or the other), abortion would only be used in the cases of rape, incest, or to protect the life of the mother. No, the arguments didn't have to add up, because if we were to suggest that it could be used as birth control, we were derided as wanting to see women dying in back alleys and on bathroom floors. No one on the pro-abortion side was that monstrous, and it would take a monster to use abortion for something so frivolous as the pregnancy being inconvenient. That was what adoption agencies were for.

Strange how we were ridiculed for accurately predicting the future.

reply

Well said. Mind-boggling how liberals are so obsessed with killing babies.

reply

Well said. Mind-boggling how liberals are so obsessed with killing babies.
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Mind-boggling and obsessive (but I should be used to it) how the trendy masses think every thought, opinion, desire, emotion boils down to "liberals", "conservatives", etc. It must be black and white, it seems, with some political-party label.
And nobody is "obsessed" (typical extreme new-age word) with killing babies. You are quite simple.

reply

"Obsessed" with the "right" to kill babies -- and that they are. And that "right" is one you find exclusively on the left.

reply

More like ''obsessed'' with the worry that women will end up killing them selves in the process of a self induced abortion or from a shady provider. Very sad what happens to women who self abort.

reply

I used to hear that argument before late term abortions (which we were promised no one would ever have), partial birth abortions (once unthinkable as monstrous), and that "morning after pill." Not to mention easily available birth control pills, even for low-income women, and condoms that actually do work. No need to worry. People are adopting children from overseas because they can't find babies here. If a woman is going to carry to late term or birth, she may as well just deliver a live baby. Those seeking adoption will happily pay for all her healthcare needs at the best of hospitals so she wouldn't have to worry about having to perform her own abortion. If they're going to be paid to have the child by the adopting parents, she might even see it as an attractive option as soon as she discovers she's pregnant.

It's not "Women will have to die from self-induced abortions!" or "This baby will be loved and cared for, because the married parents carefully planned for its birth!" There are a range of options in there, including women taking actual control of their bodies and telling the guy that sex isn't mandatory, it's always only optional, and if he wants her to be a blow up doll that he can kick to the curb when he's done with her, she's kicking him to the curb right now. Imagine a REAL women's liberation movement that taught women that last bit. It would be revolutionary!

Then you're down to rape and incest or to save the life of the mother. The child shouldn't pay the ultimate price for what someone else did. This young lady was the product of rape: https://www.today.com/style/product-rape-miss-usa-hopeful-now-educates-sexual-assault-2D79756426 Should she have been killed in utero? Doctors tell us very rarely are abortions performed to save the life of the mother. Take a look at that young lady who was the product of rape. She's why we want abortions safe and extremely rare.

reply

Then don't self-abort, something that only someone mentally-ill or extremely unintelligent would do, akin to jumping off your 6ft story apt and expecting to survive. Carrying a child/fetus for 9 mos is not the biggest struggle a person has to endure in life.

It's also "very sad" for people (and that includes men) who have no chance of living a normal life and ease in suffering (unless they kill themselves). Too bad you people are not "obsessed" with those chronic sufferers whom are not relevant to you.

Step into the shoes of my sister who died an inevitable slow-death from brain cancer and had no say about it, and wanted to live so much. And even if she did live, was brain-damaged by the radiation-treatment and would most likely require a caretaker. Given that, I couldn't care less about your 9 mos of (mostly preventable) temporary inconvenience.

reply

Well said. I'm so sorry for your sister, and for all you went through. It's just as difficult for the loved ones who have to look on and can't do anything.

reply

LOL Was you sister bald? A baldie with no brain?? AHAHA

reply