So it’s Chucky
Just an “updated “ kind
shareImportant difference--this "Chucky" is not ugly with an annoying voice (I've never actually seen a Chucky film as I was way past my teens when he came out.)
shareI actually like Brad Dourif's voice. Exorcist 3, Body Parts, and Alien 4 were really good uses of his vocal talent. As for Chuck being ugly, fair enough.
"I've never actually seen a Chucky film"
wow OK
the original Child's Play is a solid horror movie, and Brad Dourif's acting (and later voice) is haunting and awesome.
also, don't forget there was an actual plot.. criminal gang banger trying to get back to the human world through voodoo
more plausible than a knock-off Furby company suddenly advancing AI technology 25years
Much smarter. I actually think it’s more sci fi because it has elements of Blade Runner, Terminator, and AI. There are some really subtle, clever moments you may miss if not too attentive. Story is really good and fits till the very end. Not your average senseless horror flick that you want your money back when movie ends.
shareIt has elements in a way that a furby has elements. Its never utilized.
shareNo, it's more in the same vein as Frankenstein's monster. M3gan is a man-made device that goes haywire. Chuckie is a supernatural entity in the same vein as Kruger, Myers, and Voorhees.
shareChucky is also a mand made decide, just made through voodoo.
shareVoodoo as misinterpreted by the filmmakers is a supernatural force. Just like Freddy, Jason, and Michael Myers. M3gan is a man-made disaster.
shareA ghost is a supernational force. VooDoo is human-caused magic.
share...human-caused via messin' with dark supernatural elements.
shareYes, but still created by human, not occurring naturally.
shareBut the root is decidedly supernatural, merely released through human manipulation (ritual/spells/whatever). M3gan and The Stepford Wives, by contrast, are purely human-made disasters.
shareSupernatural roots could be same as technological roots, if you consider one human you must also consider the other.
share'Supernatural' means "beyond the natural" and, as such, has nothing to do with humans, except that humans can perform some ritual/incantation to try to manipulate supernatural forces.
Technology has nothing to do with the supernatural, but relates to human progress in computers/machinery/electronics, etc.
And you are completely dismissing that the ritual is humans manipulating supernatural forces while somehow accepting that a different ritual (programming) is complete dominance of technology force.
shareThe technological force you speak of is natural, not supernatural.
shareSo? Both cases here are forces that are inlfuences by human and go out of control. Whether its natural or supernatural is irrelevant.
shareIt's relevant to (1) the movie's ambiance and (2) how the protagonists defeat the forces in question.
A horror flick rooted in the supernatural will have a more spooky mood since the foundation of the horror is the unknown and (presumably) sinister spiritual entities, e.g. demons. (This also somewhat applies to movies dealing with the otherworldly, i.e. extraterrestrials, since they're unknown creatures/beings, albeit natural since they're from our shared Universe).
This doesn't mean that a horror flick based on out-of-control technology can't be creepy or scary, just that the protagonists are not dealing with the unknown, something beyond the natural realm of which we're familiar. Basically, the answer to the problem is to get a computer whiz (or whatever) to "pull the plug" and everything's back to normal. These kinds of movies can be arguably scarier since they deal with a decidedly natural element, something that could 'really' happen (at least in the viewer's mind), but they'll still lack the dark spookiness associated with horror rooted in the mystical.
Of course you may have a meshing of these.
Consider a few quick examples: "Bram Stoker's Dracula" and "The Exorcist" have that spooky atmosphere associated with the supernatural whereas "The Stepford Wives" and "Paper Man," while certainly creepy, possess a decidedly different kind of horrific ambiance. Meanwhile "Alien" and "Aliens" would be examples of horror flicks rooted in the otherworldly, which makes for a different mood compared to the other two.
Bottom line: The nature of the threat/antagonist -- whether of human/earthly origin, supernatural or extraterrestrial -- tends to determine the 'feel' of the film, as well as the manner in which the protagonists tackle the problem.
Movie Voodoo is a fantasy Horror trope, and the Chucky franchise reappropriated it to fit Chucky's ability to resurrect.
M3gan isn't based on any mythology or religious horror trope. She's a man-made robot gone awry.
Technology turning on human is a horror movie trope since like the 50s.
shareAgreed. It was a bad update.
People commenting that it was better, more refined, even sophisticated are dunces.
No it's more closer to terminator or robocop.
share