I know the controversy is utterly stupid and it doesn't even deserve to talk about it. But let's be honest, it's a good excuse to post a shadiversity video π
Is Mandalorian boob armor impractical, sexist or dangerous?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpbjSmZx3m4
Watched it. Here's another one that makes the point that close fitting armor should be compared to modern fencing a ballistic armor, which has female versions.
Disney Star Wars Mandalorian BOOB ARMOR: What's the problem? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQi5Sq1hoGY
why did you run away after posting a bogus quote from wiki?
shareYou are lying SJW lunatic! Reported for stalking.
shareI provided the quote. not lying, you are. how sad you ran away after spreading your lies.
shareNineteen Eighty-Four: A Novel, often published as 1984, is a dystopian social science fiction novel by English novelist George Orwell. It was published on 8 June 1949 by Secker & Warburg as Orwell's ninth and final book completed in his lifetime. Thematically, Nineteen Eighty-Four centres on the consequences of totalitarianism, mass surveillance, and repressive regimentation of persons and behaviours within society.[2][3] Orwell, a self described "Tory-anarchist", modelled the authoritarian government in the novel after Stalinist Russia.[2][3][4] More broadly, the novel examines the role of truth and facts within politics and the ways in which they are manipulated.
And here's the actual wikipedia post
"Nineteen Eighty-Four: A Novel, often published as 1984, is a dystopian social science fiction novel by English novelist George Orwell. It was published on 8 June 1949 by Secker & Warburg as Orwell's ninth and final book completed in his lifetime. Thematically, Nineteen Eighty-Four centres on the consequences of totalitarianism, mass surveillance, and repressive regimentation of persons and behaviours within society.[2][3] Orwell, himself a DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST, modelled the authoritarian government in the novel after Stalinist Russia.[2][3][4] More broadly, the novel examines the role of truth and facts within politics and the ways in which they are manipulated."
sad
That's NOT this topic thread. If that user got bored of you and decided not to answer you, move on or stalk him in the original thread.
Don't chase him through the forum flooding other threads with whatever the topic was in that original thread.
It was "Tory-anarchist" when I posted. Just check the edits.
I only check politics board a few times a week. You seem to spend all day.
My first search came with this, confirming my quote! Looks like SJWs have taken over Wikipedia.
https://en.unesco.org/courier/enero-1984/george-orwell-tory-anarchist
Good video. The guy knows his craft.
I'm remembering reading in the news some cases where female police officers with a generous chest had to buy her own bulletproof vest because the one provided was the standard one (which is not designed for boobs). And then she being sanctioned (no kidding) because she wasn't using the official bulletproof vest. Useless bureaucrats and boobies don't mix well.
Funny thing is that those female officers not having a female bulletproof vest was interpreted as evil white patriarchy oppressing poor women. Here you have a female Mandalorian having a female ballistic armor which is interpreted as... evil white patriarchy oppressing poor women! π
That's the thing with modern feminism: when you have an ideology that is basically about reaching the output "evil white patriarchy oppressing poor women" for whatever the input, this non-sense happens.