...or at least a post credits scene would’ve been to have another caped figure catching his mother as she was about to hit the ground. That’s how you end that movie. Why else make this sort of movie if you’re not gonna have Superman square off with his evil brother in sequels? Missed opportunity.
shareMaybe you didn't understand what you were watching but they CAN'T do that, this is in no way related to DC or Superman & if they had tried it, they'd be sued to the point where this movie wouldn't have been released. Get a clue.
shareThank you for clearing this up psychotic comic book loving manboy. I mean they showed a ship who crash landed from another planet spawning a boy in god damn cape flying around doing supernatural things but oh no let’s not tie it into Superman at all. Lmao. Since we’re having guys flying around in capes doing bad things why can’t you have an unidentifiable figure flying around in the end doing good things??
shareThen don't ask, weirdo.
shareThey never called the main character Clark Kent or Superman or used any of those copyrighted symbols, so that was fine. If they actually use Superman, then it's a copyright violation.
shareIt's not a bad idea, dramatically, but I think a main idea of the film is the uniqueness of Brandon and his existence on earth. There are no others like him, and therefore there is no defense against him. That's where both the wonder and the terror originate.
shareBecause that would be incredibly boring.
shareAnother caped figure catching his mother . . . love it! Director David Yarovesky did say there's more to the story, if the movie does well at the box office. With the mid credits scene, I got the sense that "more to the story" means aliens are using Earth as an arena and the voice that tells Brandon to take the world is his corner man, his Mickey; the world is the prize.
Or Bizarro Superman; https://moviechat.org/tt7752126/Brightburn/5cd9fe737b614e1571d68dd9/Bizzaro-Superman?reply=5d34f51c6e24074946bed686
Seriously, the OP is fvcking stupid!