I was watching a British show that was so woke it even had a little person! She only lasted one season. I can't remember who they replaced her with -- of course, I'm assuming she was a she. I shouldn't, of course, since we're now so "woke" we can't even describe what a woman is. But when a show has every single box ticked, any halfway observant person starts noticing that.
Wait. What are the various Academies going to do when it comes to Best Actor/Actress awards? How dare they assume someone's gender? And besides, since no liberal can define what a woman is, they couldn't define what an "actress" is, either. They can't even say "best actor in a female role," because THAT presumes too much. How do we know that character identifies as a "cis" female? Perhaps they've already crossed that bridge. Like most people, I don't watch the awards shows.
Eventually, liberals always go so far that even they can't stand it. Producers and directors are just saying, "To heck with it!" and saying they may not have the number of boxes checked to be considered for an Oscar, but they'll just make the movies they want the way they want to, anyhow. Privately, a lot of actors/actresses are getting worried. The women especially, because they're not only up against younger, more popular actresses, they're up against transgenders.
Soon, all this will be academic, because if they want to do a Western, the male actors will have to be up against an AI version of John Wayne. Romantic comedies can star an AI version of Marilyn Monroe. Imagine an updated version of one of the funniest movies of all time, His Girl Friday, set today, but with the original cast? AI could do it, eventually.
reply
share
TrentnQuarantino (9187)
a year ago
> we're now so "woke" we can't even describe what a woman is
Sorry you are having a problem with that. It's not an issue for me.
reply
share
Destinata (3326)
a year ago
Explain it to the liberals on the Supreme Court and in the Biden Administration. They seem to be confused.
reply
share
TrentnQuarantino (9187)
a year ago
Your brainwashers are merely telling you that ... here in the real world people know men from women, but they also don't freak out when they see something unexpected.
reply
share
Destinata (3326)
a year ago
[Judge Ketanji Brown] Jackson, the first black woman to be nominated to the Supreme Court, made her eyebrow-raising comment Tuesday when asked simply if she “could provide a definition for the word ’woman.'”
“No, I can’t,” she eventually said. “Not in this context. I’m not a biologist.” https://nypost.com/2022/03/24/supreme-court-nominee-judge-ketanji-brown-wont-define-woman/
~~~~
Which spawned the repeated asking of the question "What is a woman?" by your average Joe, who laughed hysterically at folks who couldn't provide the answer in ANY context. It also spawned jokes where people were asked, say, "Is that a plane I hear?" "I don't know," the wag responds. "I'm not an aviation engineer." And so forth.
Then there was the movie, "What Is A Woman?" in which the question was asked by Matt Walsh of lots of so-called experts who ALSO couldn't give an answer. They all claimed it wasn't simple. It sounds absurd because it IS absurd, but that's libs for you.
Is this just an American thing and you're English? If you're American, I don't see how you could have missed it.
reply
share
TrentnQuarantino (9187)
a year ago
Do you know who asked KBJ that question?
The question and the movie was out before KBJ.
Did you actually listen to the exchange?
It was a BS gotcha question not meant to be answered.
Good for her.
Matt Walsh is another idiot who can make money off you ignorant Conservatives.
reply
share
Destinata (3326)
a year ago
Dang. You never disappoint, do you?
Her hearings were in March '22. The trailer was out in May '22. No, the movie wasn't out before that question was asked. The movie came about BECAUSE of that question.
You say you can answer the question and that "in the real world people know men from women." Yes. In the real world, they do. They also can acknowledge that a lifetime of testosterone coursing through a person gives them a physical advantage. That's why you never see woman to man transgenders seeking to go into men's sports. There's no point to it.
reply
share
TrentnQuarantino (9187)
a year ago
> That's why you never see woman to man transgenders seeking to go into men's sports.
Gee, you're a real brain.
reply
share
Destinata (3326)
a year ago
And you lied about when "What Is a Woman?" came out. You also lied about conservatives "brainwashing" people when it came to that question. You were telling the truth that folks in the real world are NOT confused about what a woman is, but that actually makes the conservative point.
But other than that, this has, as always, been a fascinating discussion. I'll give you the last word since it seems to mean so much to you.
reply
share