MovieChat Forums > A Man Called Otto (2023) Discussion > James Berardinelli review - *** out of *...

James Berardinelli review - *** out of ****


https://www.reelviews.net/reelviews/man-called-otto-a

I’ve long since given up asking the question “Why?” when it comes to filmmakers turning to foreign language films for the storylines of new English-language films. Sometimes, in fact, the results can be quite satisfactory – take the 2022 reworking of Ikiru into Living – but most are simply mediocre or subpar retreads. In the case of A Man Called Otto, which owes its existence to Hannes Holm’s 2015 feature, A Man Called Ove (which, in turn, was based on the 2012 novel by Fredrik Backman), the results are admirable enough to justify the movie’s existence. Although the level of manipulation is several notches higher than in the Swedish original, A Man Called Otto boasts fine performances from Tom Hanks and Mariana Trevino and offers the kind of crowd-pleasing arc that runs counter to the prevalent mood of worldwide cynicism.

For Otto, the location has been shifted to the Pittsburgh suburbs. That’s where the title character (played by Tom Hanks) lives. A recent widower, Otto has turned into the town curmudgeon, fulfilling the “get off my lawn” stereotype to a “T.” At first, Otto seems to be just a generic disgruntled old man but, as we learn his backstory through flashbacks (in which Otto is played by Hanks’ son, Truman), he has been crushed by grief following the death of his beloved wife, Sonya (Rachel Keller). He’s in the process of getting his life in order so he can commit suicide when his preparations are interrupted by the arrival of new neighbors: a mother, father, and two girls. Although Otto would prefer to be left on his own, the pregnant woman, Marisol (Mariana Trevino), ignores his unfriendly attitude and refuses to allow him his isolation. After several failed attempt to kill himself, Otto begins to acknowledge that he might still have a purpose, even if it’s just to care for the stray cat who has adopted him as its human.

Borrowing elements (possibly unconsciously) from Ikiru and A Christmas Carol, A Man Called Otto shows how a late-in-life awakening allows a man to make a difference in his final days. For the most part, the movie avoids becoming too saccharine by leavening the expected transformation with bittersweet snippets of the past. These scenes, which illustrate how much Otto lost when his wife died, flesh out his character beyond the bare bones caricature. While some of the “present” scenes are played for comedy, there’s a deep wellspring of sadness that emerges through the flashbacks. That aspect is what elevates this movie above a generic tale about a grumpy old man whose rough edges are softened by circumstances.

It's easy – too easy, in fact – to dismiss Tom Hanks’ acting in something like this as being unworthy of awards discussion. Sure, this is in Hanks’ wheelhouse but that doesn’t mean he can’t bring depth and dimension to the portrayal. Although part of the job requires him to channel the likes of Walter Matthau and Robert DeNiro, expressing exasperation for Marisol and the cat in equal measures, there’s another facet to this performance – a poorly buried pain that is most evident in Otto’s eyes and facial expressions. Those are the fleeting moments when the audience feels an empathy for this outwardly unpleasant individual. Of the supporting performers, Mariana Trevino deserves to be singled out for her interpretation of the fiery, feisty woman who forces Otto to confront past, present, and future.

Parts of the screenplay are too facile and there’s a subplot involving a greedy real estate development corporation that is underwritten and not remotely believable. (The stuff about the “Social Media Investigation,” newly added to the remake, isn’t one of the better additions.) But the things that work in A Man Called Otto outweigh those that don’t and Hanks’ performance – probably his best since News of the World (which featured a not-dissimilar character) – is the glue that holds everything together. As 2022 remakes go, this one falls considerably short of the surprisingly high bar set by Living but it’s a heartwarming tale for the coldest part of the year.

reply

Another spammer. 624 posts and almost every one of them a James Berardinelli review. You should at least reply to someone so as not to look like such a blatant spammer.

reply

Well, sorry for being a fan of his work that I felt like posting his reviews here.

reply

Well I'm just saying when you just post exclusively that and nothing else, that's being a spammer. You won't look like a spammer if you actually interact with the people that reply to your posts. And if you reply to other people's posts. If you look at your posting history, almost every single one of your posts is one of his reviews and nothing else at all.

reply

I enjoy reading the reviews, so thanks for posting them and pay no mind to those between March and May who regularly spam the forum themselves with sarcastic gifs 😃

reply

Awwww, well isn't that just too motherfucking bad troll??

https://i.ibb.co/bNPSTcs/PWHL.gif

reply

Whoa! And you tongue kiss your family members with that mouth? Nasty.

I think we’ve already established that I don’t click on any of your idiotic gif links so I do hope you enjoyed wasting your time spamming me with them.

Happy new year sweet cheeks 😘

reply

I appreciate your posts. James's reviews are usually pretty spot on, and save me from wasting time trying to figure out if a movie is worth checking out or not.

reply

I appreciate this review because it was posted 6 days before Metacritic did. Don't care for review embargos, this played festivals months ago.

reply

I’ve long since given up asking the question “Why?” when it comes to filmmakers turning to foreign language films for the storylines of new English-language films.


And I don’t understand why anyone would even ask such a question! Isn’t the answer obvious? Hollywood is primarily a business. There is money to be made by buying the rights to a successful foreign movie and making a new version of it, especially if you can get an A-list actor like Tom Hanks to star in it. Win-win for everybody involved.

In an ideal world Hollywood wouldn’t be so dominant, more non-American films would get distributed, and “A Man Called Ove” would have been a world-wide success thus reducing the market potential of a remake. Unfortunately we don’t live in that world.

reply