That didn’t sound cliche at all. I mean... wow, people still make the “not enough explosions for you” excuse/argument? That’s right, the good ol’ “if you didn’t like this slow-paced film that’s grounded in reality and I personally felt didn’t insult my intelligence since it didn’t dare to make things exciting and fantastical, then you must be one of those low attention span philistines that needs special effects and explosions every minute in a movie” rant meant to disparage other film fans and blame them for certain films not being received well and not gaining enough traction. (Seems clear to me that many wanted to give this film a chance but ultimately found the acting to be far and away the best thing about it btw. Those calling it anti-religion/anti-Christian though? Gee, I wonder why this angry crowd would bitch about this film like they do about most modern films... I know it ain’t because of its quality.) Well duh, of course they do - this site alone is proof of that. It’s certainly what one would expect to hear from tru film fans in particular; the high and mighty Scorsese types. ;) Okey-dokey, boomas
reply
share