Do you think Roman Polanski will see this movie?
Just out of artistic curiousity? Spoilers...what if someone told him he will really like the ending?
shareJust out of artistic curiousity? Spoilers...what if someone told him he will really like the ending?
shareToo busy wid da lil gurlz
shareWell according to Samantha Geimer, she thinks people like you are not only stupid, but uninformed. Here's what she had to say on the Academy ousting Polanski:
The Academy’s decision highlights the need for the misconduct and corruption in this case, not only in 1977, but as it has continued to this day, be IMMEDIATELY investigated. The Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office has refused to pursue justice, instead it continues to cover up the illegal and inappropriate activity in the Court, and in particular, its own office. DAs are not elected to seek the limelight celebrity cases afford them as preferable to serving the public interest. The disgusting behavior in the Los Angeles Districts Attorney’s office helped create today’s trend of accusations being the same as convictions, our Courts are diminished by their actions.
As for the Academy expelling a member who 41 years ago pleaded guilty to a single charge and served his sentence, it is an ugly and cruel action which serves only appearance. It does nothing to change the sexist culture in Hollywood today and simply proves that they will eat their own to survive. I say to Roman, good riddance to bad rubbish, the Academy has no true honor, it’s all just PR.
Who?
shareEven if the ending was more to his liking I sincerely doubt he'd see it. The only reason he might is that its a very friendly portrayal of his wife and he may want to see her again in a positive light.
shareArtist like to see other masters works. Martin Scorscese really enjoys looking at other directors works, picking up styles etc..l would be curious if Polanski did the same, or if the subject matter is too painfull, even after all these years past.
shareIf someone told him he'd like the ending, they'd be wrong. Pretending something happened differently in a fantasy version of reality does not make reality go away.
share[deleted]
Roman Polanski's reality is worse than fiction. Living through the extermination of the Krakow ghettos, the slaughter of his pregnant wife and three friends. The guilt he felt for Steven Parent's death..... He lives with that pain each and every day. From what I understand he will not see the film for that reason. He knows all too well what happened.
Nothing can erase this form his mind: https://allthatsinteresting.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/roman-polanski-bloody-porch-murder.jpg The word "PIG" is written in Sharon's blood (he did not know this at the time of that photo) and the spattered blood is from when his friend Voytek Frykowski ran outside, his legs profusely bleeding from the many stab wounds Susan Atkins inflicted in his legs.
Or this: http://i68.tinypic.com/28bxquq.jpg This blood is where Sharon Tate died. He saw this on the morning he went up to Cielo Drive after the house was released back to him. That place where both his wife and son died. I'm sure he will never get this out of his head. Ever. The blood behind Peter Hurkos is where Jay Sebring died.
I think he could find it comforting to see how other people wish it had gone down.
shareI'm pretty sure Polanski understands the majority of people are not sociopaths. He received plenty of support and sympathy back then. He should've left it at that. Instead he went and did something monstrous, rightfully turning everyone against him.
shareI've never been through what Roman Polanski has been through but, like everyone else I've had my share of pain and heartbreak. I seriously doubt he will want to watch any movie that reminds him of his wife and unborn child.
shareHow would the press handle it if he did see it? Portray him as a uncaring robot or applaud him for having the emotional fortitude and stoic bearing of an Apache warrior to see it?
share