Jason Statham Is Weak - Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw (2019) Discussion

[–] actionkamen (23176) 5 years ago

The annoying thing is that Jason Statham didn't bare his abs at all, like not even once, on the entire movie! I bet he got a beer belly now!

reply

[–] bobbynynex (1505) 5 years ago

His abs are long gone. so is his muscle mass. there is a reason he's wearing a jacket the entire time.

reply

[–] actionkamen (23176) 5 years ago

There is a scene at the beginning that showed The Rock wakes up and then goes to the gym to do hard workouts, while Statham goes to a cafe sipping coffee leisurely. No wonder he lost his abs lol.

reply

[–] AquariusPrime (29) 5 years ago

That's what I'm saying. And you can see his frailty through the clothing.

reply

[–] bobbynynex (1505) 5 years ago

dude the guy is like 50, its like impossible to look jacked unless you're taking roids. i suspect he already was during his early his transporter days. his balls are all shriveled up. still a great action actor.

reply

[–] Galactus03 (4373) 5 years ago

It's not impossible you dumbass ..🙄🙄🙄😂

reply

[–] bobbynynex (1505) 5 years ago

with roids yes.

reply

[–] Galactus03 (4373) 5 years ago

Nope sorry. There are plenty of natural body builders at 50. They may not be the size of the rock but they are vascular and ripped.

reply

[–] DracTarashV2 (4493) 5 years ago

Nah. He’s a highly skilled, agile (moreso than The Rock), and dangerous middle aged man who obviously isn’t your average middle aged man.

reply

[–] AquariusPrime (29) 5 years ago

You're describing the character. Not the actor, who cannot be more agile, intelligent, or dangerous than Dwayne

reply

[–] Galactus03 (4373) 5 years ago

They both are close in age stupidnass. Staham was never a big guy. Toned and agile, The Rock is naturally a big guy. You are a stupid retard for not realizing this...

reply

[–] AquariusPrime (29) 5 years ago

So because they are a similar age, Jason Statham is not weak and decrepit by comparison? What an idiotic contribution to the discussion you just made. My fundamental point still stands.

reply

[–] Galactus03 (4373) 5 years ago

No he's not weak. He a martial artist. He has an athletic body as opposed to a body builder.

reply

[–] AquariusPrime (29) 5 years ago

Are you secretly Jason Statham? you sound like it.

How about this. The Rock could kick Jason Statham's ass. That should settle this discussion.

reply

[–] Aries (827) 5 years ago

The bad guys who got manhandled and beat up by his 120 lb little sister were the real MVPs if we're talking weakness!

reply

[–] Strazdas (2472) 5 years ago

When you get hit in the face with a hammer it does not matter how much muscle mass you have.

reply

[–] Aries (827) 5 years ago

True, except it was just one or two. The rest of them she physically beat up using just her arms & legs / body. Been a while since I saw this movie and don't remember it exactly, but don't think she used a weapon or tool against every single guy anyway.

99.99% of women can get lucky and maim or kill a guy in a fight. They don't even need luck if they're trained fighters and are facing untrained, average Joes. 0% of women can beat up tens of guys (esp. thugs who are employed as hired muscles) in different situations and be left alive in one piece to kiss the hero at the end, FACT!

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

At least he's not doing roids like The Rock.

reply

[–] Strazdas (2472) 5 years ago

Yes, its called acting a character. You know, the thing actors do.

reply

[–] contreras (470) 4 years ago

he's an actual martial artist so I bet he'd school the rock in real life

reply

[–] Kowalski (75528) 4 years ago

THIS POST IS DEFEATED IN TWO WORDS....BRUCE LEE...HOW ABOUT TWO MORE?....JET LI....STUPIDITY.

reply