when i first saw the nominations for best supporting actress, she was the one i thought should not have been nominated at all. and then she goes and wins it? i just watched EEAAO again last night and can't see why she won. i mean, she's fun in the role, and she's unrecognizable in the makeup, but she plays a pretty one-note villain. johnny depp should've been nominated for Tusk if that's the criteria, and Tusk sucks.
shareIs woke Hollyweird confusing to you? The nominees should have read to you like a SAT question and then you would've known Curtis was the correct answer.
sharebruh im having a stroke trying to comprehend your comment. not sure what any of this has to do with wokeness. and how is the SAT question formatted any different from any other test?
shareShe got swept up with the tide. I have no problem with her winning. And I absolutely disagree that she was "one note" in this. She was literally several different characters!
If Angela Bassett had won, all the racists would be screaming about "wokeness". People will always find something to complain about.
Actually she wasn’t a one-note villain. She (at least the one in the main universe) ended up being a decent person.
shareI think the standout in the whole movie was Stephanie Hsu as the daughter. Jamie L wasn't bad but she didn't get a whole lot of screentime in this movie. Hsu's character was a central figure in this film. And when JLC did get some screentime, she was often doing some kung-fu stuff which was just special effects. Lol
Not exactly what you'd expect from an actress at that age. Hsu was doing some pretty serious acting during the effects and makeup scenes and was quite convincing at it.