What really stands out in this film is all the weird racial stuff. The main character looks like Mya Rudolph; she has a very dark skinned brother; her friend is brunette and baby-sits very dark twin girls. Meanwhile most everyone in the other town is white, if not outright blonde.
This mix-and-match stuff doesn't happen much in small towns. Between that and the lesbian stuff it seems extremely revisionist, to the extent that it takes you right out of the movie.
I agree, the woke stuff was super cringe, and so forced that it really made the writing as a whole feel very awkward. It's a shame, because I actually felt a lot of the horror elements worked pretty well. Oh well. I'm sure Netflix wouldn't have agreed to produce it otherwise.
I'm not a native english speaker as well, I'm from SE Asia. I didn't have issues with the skin color because although I watch a lot of American films, I'm not that familiar with small American towns. But the woke nazi propaganda was way too much and no one acted like it was the 90s. I felt like I was watching an sjw nazi propaganda film being shoved down my throat. But it's disappointing because I grew up in the 90s and collected and read the fear street series and don't recall any of these gen z stuff in those books.
Okay, I did not read the books, so I am maybe a little more open minded. The only sjw thing I see is the lesbian story, that does not add much to the story. But I liked the characters in general, and so I can get over this propaganda part and enjoy it as a well produced horror series with great cinematography and some pretty gory elements.
The only sjw thing I see is the lesbian story, that does not add much to the story
It didn't add much to the story but basically became it. An interracial lesbian story complete with a disposable homophobic white boyfriend.
They suckered you in at the start by having the main character write a love letter to 'Sam', so that they could have their big reveal/defining moment of the film later on. None of this was in any of the books, so why?
reply share
No, the witch stuff was the tip of the iceberg but it turned out the ENTIRE rest of the iceberg was lame, cliche romance, lesbian or not would and not difference. Still lame.
Guess what? That is what most movies deal with. Sample? Godzilla. Monsters are tip of the iceberg, rest is weird relationships and a really laaame mythology.
One main thing that I dislike and I find very glaring about these woke nazi characters are how the characters are unlikable or utterly despicable and applauded for it. Maybe I'm more sensitive as a girl who loves Hollywood films and watched a lot of strong and admirable character women from the 30s onward. But these current female characters are all displayed in the worst possible light acting in the worst possible way BUT applauded for their villainy. They are basically uncharming and unlikable villains portrayed as protagonists. They are not only making women look bad, but they also teach young girls to be these despicable characters. It is sad because before if I saw a film with a strong female character, it would get me excited to watch it. But now? I'm very weary of them and try to avoid as many as possible like that Enola Homes film. I actually learned all these sjw stuff from the Star Wars sequel boards as I hated them and couldn't stand the protagonist.
They are not only making women look bad, but they also teach young girls to be these despicable characters.
Isn't that a contradiction? I mean, who wants to be such a bad looking woman?
And what was taught to all those present dislikable women in their 30's? By which movies? Fear Street is not to blame for this...
reply share
Huh? I didn't understand your reply, sorry. Bad looking - are you talking physicality? They're making women look evil yet applauding these evil characteristics, that's what I meant that they look bad. It has nothing to do with their physical looks. Look at Ellen Ripley and how she is depicted in Alien and compare that character to Rosamund Pike in I Care A Lot. The former shows a strong logical woman who has to face adversity and survive against all odds, she is likable, presented as a teamworker, a good subordinate but an even better leader. Someone who unlike the rest of her shipmates, was the most logical of them all. The latter shows a despicable evil woman who preyed on the weak and uses her gender to justify her evil deeds against the elderly and a son trying to rescue his mother yet is shown as the protagonist that's cool and admirable by the woke nazis.
The main character here is also unlikable, uncharismatic, a karen looking to destroy anyone along her path, this is the protagonist of this show?
You want to show a villain in a good light? You have to make people care for them, you need a charismatic character, someone who despite their villainy shows a vulnerability and some good moral characteristics about them. Woke cinema don't have that because they see good in evil, you can see it in their history, kkk, pro apartheid, pro abortion, pro slavery, pro segregation, pro communism, pro nazi germany, pro pedophilia, pro anarchy, etc.
Women in their 30s? I'm talking about films from the 1930s that had strong women characters. The 1960s introduced the sexualization of women as objects in cinema and today makes women look just plain evil - yet both had its adherents, feminists, applauding this portrayal because they spearheaded it.
The main character here is also unlikable, uncharismatic, a karen looking to destroy anyone along her path
That's something I don't see. I see an adolescent girl making some development.
And - OMG - you mentioned I care a lot. I don't see Rosamund Pike as the heroine there. It is more a caricature of a modern, woke, strong woman. And thinking this way I survived the movie. I bet Miss Pike enjoyed making this movie a lot, using her looks to create someone really evil, someone you don't want to meet in real life.
reply share
I bet if you sat down and watched "Welcome Back Kotter" you'd bitch about the same "weird racial stuff" and "forced diversity" aspect of the show as well right?
Hardly. That was representative of its time and place. This was not. WBK was NOT forced. This was. If you can't see the difference then you have way too little experience in the world and way too much white liberal theory crammed down your throat.