Since you are setting the bar for ultimate success domestically being if it gets close to matching the much lesser IP of BATB you may want to remember another important fact.
TLK cost a whopping 100 million more than BATB.
This is a totally new approach to find a wedge to attempt to deride Disney. IP? I'll take a go at that. Here try this on for size:
Which studio had the greater IP value WB/DC or Disney/Marvel? Let's see: Batman, Superman, Green Lantern, Flash, etc surely had more IP Market Value, IP Film Value, IP Social Awareness Value and IP Capitalization Potential Value than any Disney/Marvel character wouldn't you say? Inter-company (external to the company or the market at-large) and Intra-Company (inside the company exclusively) DC towered over Marvel in films with DC's, ahem, IP Capitalization. Did you ever bring up IP then? **crickets**
Is Warner/DC embarrassed that their High-Value IP of Batman and Superman grossed less than Wonder Woman and Aquaman? Curious, I don't remember you EVER mentioning that? I just made up a new hammer against WB/DC.
RIPV (Reduced-Intellectual-Property-Value) that has infected the portfolio of characters belonging to WB/DC. I believe WB/DC leads the industry in RIPVs to the point that the Justice League is diminished by the sum of the parts. If the IP of Cyborg is included in JL the total IP of JL goes down. How does THAT happen? Who would do such a thing and devalue their own IP film product. yet you didn't say a word about IP then.
Let's move over to Universal and their IP. Let's pick SLOP and SLOP2.
How do you take an IP, increase the budget by $5 Million and achieve a result that diminishes the OW by greater than 50%, decreases the Domestic take by greater than 50% and see the total WW fall by greater than 50% and QueenFanUSA doesn't say a word. Not word one.
How are the holds? How are the legs? Why spend more on an IP and make less, considerably, demonstrably and objectively less and you not sound the
**RED ALERT** early warning system?
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Warning+Red+Alert+Sounds&&view=detail&mid=FB7DA52F38FA10BBB781FB7DA52F38FA10BBB781&&FORM=VRDGAR
Miss me with this IP crap that you are suddenly peddling!!
[–] QueenFanUSA (2035) 6 days ago
Ummmm...maybe because this is a once-in-a-generation IP for Disney and if it couldn't crack a billion It would be a DISASTEROUS stewardship of said IP?
You don't care about IP. You've NEVER EVER cared about IP. You're just hoping that TLK2019 doesn't gross as much as BATB2017 even though the film will have netted over $300+ Million in profit for Disney by even your own loosey-goosey breakeven formula.
You've NEVER been embarrassed by the Fast and Furious returns on investment, profits from one film to the next, given their ever increasing budget. You don't even care if the IP value of the Fast and Furious will be damaged by this Hobbs & Shaw spin-off.
You've never said word-one about the IP value of Harry Potter versus the Fantastic Beasts spin-off prequels have you? Have you ever posted that WB should be embarrassed if Fantastic Beasts makes more than the individual films of HP?
And you say that you don't troll and now you're trawling? Here's a definition:
an act of sifting through something as part of a search.
You're looking for something, anything to hammer Disney with in your never-ending tirade against all things or anything related to Disney performance.
Yet you say you don't Troll but you will accuse BillBrown of being dishonest by uber-posting facts and opinions about you, what you post and why you post.
Yet you say you don't Troll?
reply
share