Only a form of friendship between Leonard and Emily was suggested, not one of sufficient intimacy to justify her changing her will in his favour.
Well, I don't remember the film terribly well, but as far as I am concerned the original story set-up made more sense than the current adaptation.
In it Emily was about 75. Vole's version is that Emily had known about Romaine, and considered him "an adopted son"; however the maid, surely correctly, insisted that Emily believed him to be single and was contemplating marriage in the future. Crucially, Emily was an eccentric old lady (who owned eight cats) who was
not at all used to the attentions of handsome young men and so became infatuated with this one. That's why changing her will in his favour made complete sense.
However in this adaptation Emily is a sexually active middle aged woman with a strong appetite for a bit of rough, paid for if required. Her men usually last a couple of weeks. The script goes to the trouble of of showing the begining of this affair, making it clear that Emily is in complete control, but elides the development of ther relationship, and doesn't plausibly show why such a strong woman would fall for Vole to such a degree as to change her will in his favour. So while far more colourful, I'd say that this version is actually
less plausible than Christie's original.
Call me Ishmael...
reply
share