MovieChat Forums > Rillington Place (2016) Discussion > Some observations and questions after ep...

Some observations and questions after episode 2.


I feel sorry for Evans who seems to have been just bullied into a confession by the police much like Brendan Dassey was in "Making of a Murderer". Extremely sad.
But whereas Dassey is classified as mentally subnormal then it seems like Evans was reasonably smart (although a bit *beep* at lying) but easily influenced, but that doesn't explain to me why he felt the need to protect Christie when he was arrested.
He could have spilled the beans about Christie's pretense to be a doctor, the botched abortion and his part in it, the disposal of the body under Christie's guidance and Christie's promise to take care of the baby by giving her to the childless couple in Acton.
Was he a pathological liar or was he so weak that he buckled under the police interrogation and they were desperate for him to confess?
In either of which cases then something doesn't add up to me in terms of the story that we're being told.
Maybe I'm alone in thinking this, but it doesn't gel to me.

If the opposite of Love is indifference, what's the opposite of Hate?

reply

Evans had a fairly low IQ and considered Christie to be intelligent so believed everything he was told.

It does sound wrong, but Ludovic Kennedy's book explained it very well. Evans felt that Christie made an error and didn't mean any harm. Christie convinced him that it would be far easier to cover things up than get too involved with the police so that one of them might come under suspicion.

He was frightened and weak-minded. Also, when he found out what had happened, he was in such shock, he did not care any more what happened to him.

reply

Thanks for the explanation.
I've not read the book and it's been years since I saw the film,but that makes sense to me.
Cheers, Will.

If the opposite of Love is indifference, what's the opposite of Hate?

reply