MovieChat Forums > The Thinning (2016) Discussion > Huge plot holes I can't get over... Spoi...

Huge plot holes I can't get over... Spoilers...


I thought this was a decent film but ruined by two massive plot holes that I just can't forget about.

When changing the results of the tests why on earth would they have swapped a fail for a 98% pass and an all star student? That was never going to go unnoticed. Why not just swap it for the next lowest score?

The kids don't die, they get sent of to factory slave labour which I suppose is a representation of what happens to low achievers in real life, BUT, what is the point of the thinning in the first place? It's meant to be because of lack of resources and population reduction but instead the thinning affects neither, they just get cheap or free labour... If it doesn't reduce population or save resources, why carry on with the thinning? I mean how many people do you need to put tablets in boxes?






reply

Those are good points you mention. What I didn't understand was: if the children passed the test once why would the same children need to keep taking it each year, just in case they become stupid? Doesn't make sense. It would make more sense if the test is administered in order for the children to graduate or in order to go from elementary to middle school then to high school then to graduate. Unless something like a brain disorder occurs, IQ's usually increase not decrease. I only had to take my SAT's once in my life not every year.

If the test is given every year in order to check in and make sure no one suffered some kind of brain damage from an accident or something, then adults should be administered the test as well each year. As adults begin to become elderly, they might become stupid.

Not to mention a test is a horrible way to determine intelligence. There's so many factors that could cause someone to fail a test and yet still be extremely intelligent. Anxiety over failing the test could cause one to perform badly. Add in the fact that the test will determine how the rest of your life turns out and that could put a bit of pressure and anxiety on the kids.

Some might even say that it is that way now with our current education system. Fail a test and your life is over. Start looking for a McJob. No offense to those who work at McDonald's.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_BbtXj2P4g

reply

And why exactly was it better for the State over say the 1 child policy anyway?

Having all those kids costs money in wasted education funds, health costs, food etc etc, drains the peoples spirit when they are 'killed' etc....AND the cost of the testing!

Plus what is the point? to have garbage men who can do calculus?

reply

The point in testing yearly, is to weed out those who are lazy. There are kids who did well in middle school, once they advanced to high school they lost their way and became lazy.

For example, the dumb jock football player, he thought he was all that and in the end he was just another lazy brain dead football player.

On another note, playing football only makes you dummber due to the amount of blows to the head. The movie Concussion (2015) did not inform people with the greater truth, Those who play contact sports will have lasting effects on brain function, so in closing smart people do not play sports.

reply

There are certainly holes in the plot and more continuity issues than I have time to list, but the two issues you mention I think could be explained away with ease.

Mason switched the scores he may have wanted Blake to have the highest score, or maybe he knew that Laina came from a poor family, a family with no structure that would take issue as her father is gone and her mother is hospitalized, or maybe it was the name of the only person he didn't recognize. But that's all beside the point with issues. You can't just swap scores like that, and in the scene (30 minutes into the film) he swaps a 42% with an 80%. To me, plus the other kids that were switches backs up my previous point as this is clearly a common practice and so you need students whose family have no power or money to speak up. Laina is ideal because she's been acting as the matriarch since her mother became ill.

Slave labor is probably considered less humane than a merciful killing. Plus, this is clearly unknown to other countries, and Gov. Redding makes a point to state how advanced the US is as a result of 10-241.



A spattering of issues that bother me are:
1) He has access to a computer but he decides to use <i>snail mail</I> for his video message. Maybe he knows his computer is monitored so he'd be stopped before the test started, but he still needs to pass on his own merits and wouldn't be forced to pass, and he clearly didn't know about the switching method in place. Plus, what fancy neighborhood has an mailbox on the street like that today, much less the future.

2) They don't check the badge ID to make sure the credentials match the user? Sure, the power is down, but even today a school could have a handheld device that could hold the teachers DB on it. Tablets clearly were common in this movie.

3) Longhand math done on that tiny tablet without a stylus? I don't see that as feasible, but that's more in line with a low budget film trying to make ends meet.

4) It sure took Blake a long time to dress up in the guard's uniform that would both obscure his identity and afford him some protection, weapon, and possibly access to a communications device so he knows what's going. Laina may be a little short for a <i>schooltrooper</I> but it's better than nothing.

5) When you change the Pass/Fail, you assume that the scores would also go with the student as Pass/Fail would be an indictor based on the score, not independent of it. However, the system is failed so it could've been designed with a backdoor to change that for the privileged.

reply

I like the plot holes already mentioned - in fact somebodywaiting's two were two of my biggies.
The other big one is that clearly quite a few people were in on this being rigged. The more people who know - the more likely someone will squeal.
There is also another minor one - the rate at which they seem to be killing people off would make this politically unpalatable pretty damn quickly.
Also I agree with one of the posters above - putting resources into kids you are just going to kill seems foolish.

reply