MovieChat Forums > Good Behavior (2016) Discussion > OK, now I am truly DONE with this show.

OK, now I am truly DONE with this show.


SPOILERS>>

After the sudden and unexplained reconciliation with and found-again trust from her back-home friend, Letty walks in on the friend's hubby and his best buddy doing the nasty in his office. And even though she is a fugitive breaking her restraining order with her hit-man boyfriend when she's aware they've been identified for the B&B killing, she spends a leisurely day shopping with her now-we-find-out-he's-also-proud-to-be-a-thief son. And now, yet another person is fully aware of her whereabouts in the babysitter she bribed. Meantime, good ol' Christian is on the FBI grill and knows all about her recent activity... a bargaining chip if there ever was one.

I am sorry to have to say this, but am not sorry to actually say it... this show has jumped 1000 sharks already. Might very well be the stupidest plot line on TV today. "Dick-deep in my bestie?" Come on.

reply

lol so you are recapping an episode... and we're supposed to just guess why you're done with the show? (also, I guess, we're supposed to care)

I am sorry to have to say this, but am not sorry to actually say it... this show has jumped 1000 sharks already.

Yeah. Look up "jumping the shark" please. It doesn't mean that the show is not interesting to you.

For every lie I unlearn I learn something new - Ani Difranco

reply

Sorry you're not enjoying it. Personally I love it.

reply

You expect realism? The main storyline is of a parolee con artist partnering up with a hitman! It's fun and entertaining, not deep and meaningful. Too bad you can't enjoy it for what it is: a dark comedy, melodrama, and farce rolled into one.

reply

Maybe the OP thought this was a documentary?

Jaan Pehechan Ho

reply

After the sudden and unexplained reconciliation with and found-again trust from her back-home friend,

What was so unexplained? Letty even asked why the friend was being nice. The friend found out that it was husband's drugs and not Letty's. She probably also realized that Letty was covering for him.


Letty walks in on the friend's hubby and his best buddy doing the nasty in his office.

Yeah, because she and the friend were going to talk to him about getting off drugs. But the whole point of that scene was part of the comedy of the show. It being after Letty saod that he would end up under a bridge giving BJs under a bride due to addiction.


And even though she is a fugitive breaking her restraining order with her hit-man boyfriend when she's aware they've been identified for the B&B killing, she spends a leisurely day shopping with her now-we-find-out-he's-also-proud-to-be-a-thief son.

She and Javier have not been identified. Police released a sketch but no one knows who they actually are. And she's aware she's breaking the restraining order hence the whole segment of Jacob saying she was his model aunt and her paying off the the homeless woman to pretend to be Jacob's mother.


Meantime, good ol' Christian is on the FBI grill and knows all about her recent activity... a bargaining chip if there ever was one.

The FBI have Christian for the theft at the hotel. Dumbass used the credit card Letty stole at the hotel to buy Cheez Its at a gas station. They searched his place and found the money.

It has nothing to do with Letty and Javier being wanted for murder. A murder Christian doesn't know about anyway. Nor does the FBI know that Letty was involved. Hell, they don't even know it was a murder because Javier had the bodies cremeated. All they know is that the couple is mission.

Good thing your giving up the show. Sounds like you haven't been paying attention anyway.


I don't trust people who don't like pets and I don't trust people who pets don't like.

reply

I know what you mean. That whole episode was a train wreck especially the sequence at the compartment store. I'm still watching but not holding my breath and adjusted my rating to -2 from my first one.

reply

I felt this way the pilot ep. Too many stupid scenes.




šŸˆ Rachel

reply