I dont mind too many bad words but is the implication that the uncle is a pedo that kidnapped the kid realy obvious? Or is it only implied and only an udult would get the underlyin gist?
Its fairly obvious.
shareIt is obvious but the viewer knows that it isn't true all through the movie.
There are a few parts where the suggestion is more subtle, but mostly he is called a 'molesterer' by a lot of characters, including the kid. Again though the viewer knows at all times that he isn't, the movie doesn't imply that it is true at any point.
There's nothing like a warm fire and a SuperSoaker of fine cognac - Bender
It's obvious, but not as 'on the nose' as School of Rock, if that's any help.
shareI think it's fine. The Perv/pedo thing is done in the context of a kid that doesn't get it either. It's innocent enough. I saw it with a 9 year old. The issue for her was the pig scene. It was over the top gore without anything actually graphic. As a child and animal lover it was a bit much for her.
shareI think it's fine. The Perv/pedo thing is done in the context of a kid that doesn't get it either. It's innocent enough. I saw it with a 9 year old. The issue for her was the pig scene. It was over the top gore without anything actually graphic. As a child and animal lover it was a bit much for her.
I watched this with my 7 year old. It was a great movie but he did break down at the pig part. Smart kid, big heart.
that's what she said 🐕