inaugurating the ZortMcFleen messageboard!
Zort...you're coming across as either obsessed by this subject, or someone (God?) has given you a mission to "educate" us simpletons who happen to want to listen to both sides of this argument. You have been an IMDB member since 2011 but before you contributed many many dozens of postings to the "Denial" message board you only contributed one other: in 2011 for the doco "Ayn Rand & the Prophecy of Atlas Shrugged". That first-time contribution was the one word comment "Snorefest". Since that taciturn utterance, and after waiting 5 years, you have certainly found your voice here. My compliments!!
You've used this board for skewering everyone from Steve Bannon to those who are interested in the Khazar origin of the Ashkenazi. Don't you understand that by seeking to silence people like Steve Bannon you're only confirming in the minds of many that the Bannon is correct, that he is on the right track and he must be silenced and discredited before he is heard by too many. This is quite intolerant and fascist of you.
As for your rebuttal of the Khazar theory of the origin of the Ashkenazi -- given elsewhere on the "Denial" boards-- you state that the genetic evidence is *clear* -- that the Ashkenazi are *not* descended from the Khazars. This is incorrect. For example, noted Duke University anthropologist and scholar Nadia Abu El-Haj has claimed:--
******
the issues of origins are generally complicated by the difficulties of writing history via genome studies and the biases of emotional investments in different narratives, depending on whether the emphasis lies on direct descent or on conversion within Jewish history. The lack of Khazar DNA samples that might allow verification also presents difficulties
******
[See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazars#Genetic_studies]
In other words, the jury is still out. Zort, your emotional investment is admirable but it can lead you down the wrong track.