Rachel Weisz offensive portrayal as a Jewish person
I'm Jewish and I thought I was watching a spoof of a Jew.
I'm Jewish and I thought I was watching a spoof of a Jew.
Rachel Weisz is actually Jewish, she seems to have portrayed a Jewish role you don't care for. I thought she was great.
Oh, and I'm offended that you are offended.
The accent was meant to be over the top Jewish, and also when she arrived in England and had to pay for her cab ride, it showed her scrounging in her purse for exact change; hyping up the stereotype that Jewish people are cheap.
I'm allowed to find it offensive, DEAL WITH IT!
if she was so cheap, why did she overpay the taxi driver, who prompty returned the excess amount and said verbatim she was overpaying?
So you may also delete that leading phrase 'scrounging through her purse for exact change' as it is baseless in reality. you're welcome.
No, the accent was meant to be accurate Queens. If you think that's "over the top," you haven't heard many native New Yorkers lately, and you definitely haven't heard Lipstadt herself.
And yes, her fumbling with unfamiliar currency in London comes straight from the book.
I am a Native NYer and having someone portray NYC accents is in no way offensive. Same goes for whether the actress portraying a Jewish historian is actually Jewish or not. It's Hollywood. The taxi scene shows her paying too much because as an American she is likely tipping the taxi driver 20% when in London people tend to round up to the nearest pound which would never amount to 20%. It was reference to her being American not a Jewish NYer. No need to be offended but certainly you can be offended if you'd like.
shareShe was portraying a Jewish person from Queens NYC. The accent is accurate. As for the taxi cab and the fare, she was portraying an American confused with U.K. Coinage. What's so hard to understand? I'm offended at your hypersensitivity. Sometimes it's just a cigar you know.
shareI'm offended by your mentioning a cigar. Cigars are unhealthy.
shareI love Rachel Weisz and this is the first time I've really disliked a performance of hers. All the other actors were superb. I think part of the problem was her fake NY accent. When some Brit actors try to do American accents, it comes out LOUD and flat. They don't seem capable of 1) doing an accent and 2) acting, giving subtle intonations with their voices at the same time. She's certainly not the only British actor poor at accents, but this was really bad. I sort of agree it seemed like a spoof performance, almost like she was imitating Anne Bancroft in 84 Charing Cross Road.
And her wig? Really? It just made her look tacky and didn't look vaguely like real hair.
A shame because it was a very good film.
1) Rachel Weisz is Jewish
2) Her accent isn't any more "over the top" than the real Deborah Lipstadt or plenty of other people from Queens
3) Her scrounging for change in her purse to pay the taxi driver was a real thing straight out of her book, and was because she was an American in England and was confused about how stuff worked and wasn't sure how much she was supposed to pay him. Also she overpays him and tells him to keep the change, so how does it make her look cheap??
my movie review website: http://www.jestersreviews.com