I had a look at the gas chamber rooms, but I don't understand how so many could've been gassed and cremated within the time frame Birkenau was open for. It would've taken many more years with the chambers running 24/7 to reach the numbers claimed. So it's pretty obvious the numbers killed would've been a lot lower than claimed. Therefore, why is it so taboo to suggest such a thing? Do people not like skepticism?
Then you must either be a time-traveller or very old, given that the Nazis dynamited them in the winter of '44-'45.
It would've taken many more years with the chambers running 24/7 to reach the numbers claimed.
One of the golden oldies of Holocaust denial. Even the hapless dolt Leuchter proffered that one -- or tried to, until he was laughed out of the courtroom. And Irving tried the same spin. Ah, the classics. Rockin' those denier lies old-school.
For a look at the actual math -- so you'll have some clue of what you're talking about -- see chapter II of van Pelt's report for the Lipstadt trial. https://hdot.org/vanpelt/ reply share
I'm not sure what you're trying to claim, because they were demolished we still can't see the building outline that still sits there today? Or we can't view blueprints? You seem to have an axe to grind, you're not impartial.
You know, it seems like what the Holocaust deniers most want is to do two simultaneously contradictory things -- they want to (a) insist they are serious scholars doing serious scholarship in a way that should be taken so very very seriously, and aren't they really just raving anti-Semites at all, no sirree bob, while (b) spreading The News about how the evil Jews are running the world and destroying the goyim.
It's something of a sign of the quality of the tapioca pudding they're using for brains that they don't notice the contradiction.
Once again, scratch a Holocaust denier, find an anti-Semite.
What's wrong with anti-semitism?
To answer the OP, no the Nazis wouldn't have been able to gas and cremate prisoners on anything like the scale purported. But don't let the truth get in the way of a good story, we goyim should accept our white guilt without question and turn a blind eye to the atrocities committed in the name of Israel. reply share
Dont give into the Jew lies. The truth is their enemy.
As I've said here before, Holocaust denial doesn't have an anti-Semitic wing and a not-anti-Semitic wing, it's got a anti-Semitic-and-show-it wing and an anti-Semitic-but-hide-it wing.
It's funny how many of the Holocaust deniers who've come to this board try to get the anti-Semitism question off the table by starting with "I'm not an anti-Semite but..." followed by the same old denier crap. But ask them whether they agree with what this Jew-hating clown is saying, and they just can't seem to say no.
[Edit:] In fact, let's try it. Hey, Jimmycakes, manoz sez the Jews are the enemy of truth. Do you agree?
reply share
Nobody is a Holocaust denier you dumb punk. To deny the Holocaust would imply that it happened and then you are denying it. I am saying it was mostly made up, exaggerating the actual Jewish suffering
Everyone with an IQ over that of a bagful of gravel thinks something is being denied, because it is. Your vapid word game doesn't change a thing.
But it's typical of the Holocaust denial morons to think a vapid word game like the one you deploy somehow outweighs the mountains of evidence which show the Holocaust happened, that the Nazis ordered it, that they built gas chambers for genocide, and that they murdered about six million Jews.
reply share
Nobody is a Holocaust denier you dumb punk. To deny the Holocaust would imply that it happened and then you are denying it. I am saying it was mostly made up, exaggerating the actual Jewish suffering
Heck, even David Irving admitted under cross-examination in the trial that there had been what he called "systematic" gassing of the Jews, but then he tried to quibble about numbers.
So not only is your position dumb by normal human standards, it's even dumb by Holocaust denier standards.
You're pretty clearly in about half a mile over your head.
Revisionists can't take David Irving seriously anymore. The best theory I've read about him is that he was so convinced by the Leuchter Report and the proceedings of the Zundel trial that he really thought Revisionism was going to succeed, but then Zundel was unjustly imprisoned and eventually deported and things didn't go quite the way Mr Irving intended. After suffering from the factual things we were discussing in that other post, he now seems to have backtracked quite a bit and is spouting nonsense about gassings, in a recent video referring to a useless post-war confession document from Norway in order to support the idea that gassings took place in a "small room."
He is clearly caving in to pressure from terrorists. Fred Leuchter says that we can't blame him. Perhaps he is right--but, nevertheless, David Irving is no longer able to be trusted. NOW I WOULD call him a falsifier of history. In the Revisionist court, he is guilty.
Hilarious! You insist insist insist you're not a Holocaust denier, and then say that you're more of a Holocaust denier than David Irving the Holocaust denier.
Holocaust denial is a logic-free zone of Jew-haters, as you continue to demonstrate splendidly.
I'm not a Holocaust Denier, because I don't deny that there were concentration camps in which Jews were interned and in which they died (the working, widely accepted definition of Holocaust Denial).
I'm more of a Revisionist than David Irving, certainly. Because I'm not a big name celebrity whose very life is at threat by terrorists and poisoned governments. I am still free to think freely and speak the truth, a luxury Irving unfortunately no longer has. His retreat from high Revisionism is circumstantial but actual.
I'm not a Holocaust Denier, because I don't deny that there were concentration camps in which Jews were interned and in which they died (the working, widely accepted definition of Holocaust Denial).
In other words, you don't deny the Holocaust, as long as you're given the power to redefine "Holocaust" however you choose.
From the New Oxford American Dictionary:
(the Holocaust) the mass murder of Jews under the German Nazi regime during the period 1941–45. More than 6 million European Jews, as well as members of other persecuted groups, such as gypsies and homosexuals, were murdered at concentration camps such as Auschwitz.
Blew it again, didn't you. Facts are not your friend, are they.
reply share
THEY ATE LOTS OF TACOS & BURRITOS 😀 IN REALITY NO MORE THAN 600-750,000 DIED, & THAT WAS MOSTLY DUE TO ALLIED BOMBING RAIDS ON THE GERMAN LOGISTICS RAIL LINES, STARVATION TOOK OVER & PESTILENCE. THERE WERE NO DEATH CAMPS AS SHOWN IN ALL OF THE PROPAGANDA FILMS POST 40'S ERA... ________________________________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/loveunderlaw