Reminder: The "evidence" van Pelt provided was deceptive

In court, van Pelt "proved" the Germans required as little as 3.5 kg of coke to cremate a body by referring to an incinerator that was never actually built. Van Pelt managed to pass off text from Klaus and Christel Kunz's 1985 report on the 1942 Topf patent application as being text from the application itself.

The leading Auschwitz "expert" van Pelt "proved" the Germans needed just 3.5 kg of coke per body.... by referring to an oven that he knew was never built.

Why was van Pelt reduced to committing perjury if the "holocaust" happened as alleged? If it did happen as alleged, he would not have needed to lie like that.

The narrative doesn't add up. It was logistically impossible.
Physics doesn't lie; people do.