Gun control

You don't need a military machine gun to hunt ducks.

>>I wouldn't give the right to drive to any idiot who wants it, regardless of their mental and physical state and their knowledge about cars and driving.

Guns aren't handed out like coupons at the supermarket to the mentally deranged.

Regarding cars, here in the States we have illegal immigrants receiving driver's licenses.

>>I am sorry, but USA would not suffer so much from gun-related violence if there were some adequate gun control.

Tell that to the city of Chicago, especially the South Side, where this September the city passed the 500 mark of homicides due to guns. The tickler? The city has one of the most strick gun laws in the nation.

>>Hell, your fuскing second amendment is about a REGULATED MILITIA. Both words mean regulation, and regulation, by its very definition, is control.

Wrong on both counts.

You didn't include the entire amendment. It's "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

It's often said by those who object to private citizens possessing firearms that the word "militia" is the trump card saying that only a military like group, like each state's National Guard or police force, can carry a gun. This is a misunderstanding since it's often interpreted by the anti-gun side that the first part dictates the second part. They'll then move onto the word "regulate." The word doesn't mean that the government can pick and choose what firearms a private citizen can hold; "regulate" at that time means well-educated, competent, in gun handling. The Federalist Papers and The Declaration of Independence talks about private citizens being allowed to protect themselves against others and the government (tyranny). There's also a huge clue pertaining to the "right of the people" - the comma. So the 2nd Amendment talks about two separate groups possessing firearms: the militia and "the people", "the people" being the non-members of the militia, be it the local college professor or the mechanic down the street.

If you want to talk about closing any supposed loopholes, sure, go at it. But the 2nd Amendment allows the citizens of the US to own guns if their individual state/county allows them to (another issue of "tyranny" of local government - saying no to gun ownership even though it's written plain as day in the 2nd Amendment that such ownership is an actually right).

"A well-schooled electorate being necessary to the foundation of a free state, the right of the people to keep and read books shall not be infringed."

So who has the right to keep and read books? Everyone? Or just registered voters with a college degree?

You need to have some decent amount of self-confidence and courage to carry around a weapon that can shoot you in the foot if you aren't careful and lethally kills others. So no, guns aren't for the cowards or the psychos. That's like saying cars that run on gas are for those that hate the earth and are too lazy to travel by foot.