I bet Jessica has armed bodyguards in real life.
Bank on it
share[deleted]
Do you think pro-gun celebrities would ask their bodyguards to carry illegal weapons?
And DiCaprio donates literal millions of dollars to environmental protection organizations, buys carbon credits, and supports green construction projects around the world (including his own property). I think we can cut him some slack for flying private.
I find Oscar Bait infinitely more interesting than ticket bait
[deleted]
Decaprio has been found to be involved in embezzlement. Also the weapons are not illegal for them, only for poor sheep like us. Nice try though.
shareDecaprio has been found to be involved in embezzlementEven assuming that is true, it has little to do with his environmentalist causes.
Also the weapons are not illegal for them, only for poor sheep like us.which law, or proposed law, states that? Be specific.
I find Oscar Bait infinitely more interesting than ticket bait share
The unwritten law that tells celebrities they have a right to armed security while the "lesser" people like us do not.
shareYou see, this is the kind of idiocy that caused me to leave the leftist movement for good - certain people from that movement are replacing other people's words in order to fit their agenda. If I dislike Rey from 'The Force Awakens', it is not because she is a badly thought out character, which she is, it is because I am sexist. This is just an example.
You are doing the same thing - you are replacing people's words in order to fit your agenda. Gun control and gun ban are different things. It is one thing to give the right to own and use a gun to someone who has the necessary training and whose job depends on this, and it is a completely different thing to give the same right to someone who hasn't proved he or she is psychologically stable and can shoot well enough.
---
Click here:
http://soundcloud.com/tigermaster/
[deleted]
Like environment issues, its all: Do as I say, not as I do.
So, only armed bodyguards with gun training and well paid are allowed to have guns? Is this your argument? :)
The argument of people who misuse guns go to jail is out of the windows if you have more and more people doing this $§%$% who don't expect to survive the attack.
More and more people run around doing crazy *beep* and those who sell them guns don't really care if the go bezerk.
There is also lots of data available, that in case of something going really wrong, the guns in the open carry states are for no good use. Because its about you bi monthly shooting range bad under pressure guy against some super aggressive with armor, m16+extended clips and daily training. And the data shows that.
Whats left is, lots of people are dead and lots of theatricals of people in open carry state running for their lives, instead of firing their guns. Surveillance video shows that again and again.
share
No, the argument is against that only wealthy people deserve to be safe. America is different because the peasants have the same rights as Kings. I'm guessing you aren't from around here.
You know who you rarely see at a shooting competition? Cops. Trust me, for every cop on the street, there are 9 civvies with AR's who are more proficient. When cops win, it is because they overwhelm with force, but when stretched thin and it comes down to one on one, it won't turn out so well. I guess all your street experience comes from watching Hollywood produced propaganda films with all that realistic gun play (who needs laws of physics).
Hillary might well have tried complete confiscation, but I'm pretty sure she would have had a hard time finding anyone willing (or able) to follow her orders on day 2.
Remember how well they dad at Waco on day 1?
My Chimp DNA seems to have lost its password temporarily. Sluggr-2