MovieChat Forums > Frozen II (2019) Discussion > 3D version not worth the extra cost!

3D version not worth the extra cost!

posted 5 years ago by MonStar (12916)
1 reply | jump to latest

In 3D they had a lot of snowflakes popping out at you as the film began. Then a leaf was flying around, popping out at you. But that was it for 3D. No other memorable scenes with things popping out. A waste of the extra cost for 3D.

I brought two girls to see it, ages 6 and 8. They loved it and wanted to see it again. We brought two of their friends and saw it again three weeks later in 2D. The friends loved it too. They were all laughing at Olaf's jokes, throughout the film, as were others in the theater.

It was really nice to see the flashback to when Elsa and Anna were young children.

[–] LuckyLucius (342) 5 years ago

The reason why Disney decided to make Frozen II in a 3D version is because 3D versions of animated films are huge now. I remember seeing the 3D version of the original Frozen in the theater and I thought it was okay but the 3D effects gave me a headache and I don't know why movie theaters have this especially around young children because it may cause them eye problems. But next thing you'll know like Disney did with the original Frozen is that they will release a Sing-Along Edition of Frozen II later on to keep making money