MovieChat Forums > Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising (2016) Discussion > Why are so many IMDB posters bleep-holes...

Why are so many IMDB posters bleep-holes?


Every comedy involving Seth Rogen or any of the 'Brat pack' yields the same dumb and tired forum posts:

Dumb *beep* awful humour, only idiots enjoy this *beep* Rogen et al are dicks, etc. etc. etc.

How many wasted hours are being posted on IMDB daily? by people that don't like this particular type of humour yet persist in A. watching these films and B. wasting their time posting illiterate rants on IMDB broadly announcing their 'superior taste in humour' which by definition apparently equates to 'superior intelligence'.

Well here is my 10 cents worth...

*beep* you, *beep* all of you.

In my opinion, you are the ones that have *beep* taste in comedy.

I like toilet humour, I like physical and slapstick comedy, I like constant jokes about weed (even though I don't smoke it). I find dick and ball jokes funny, I also don't care about bad language, violence or nudity, in fact I enjoy them.

I also enjoy 'normal' comedy.

But I'd rather be a *beep* idiot that laughs at retarded jokes than a pathetic whining douche who has to cry every time a film doesn't quite satisfy their exceptional palate for witty comedy.

By all means, go ahead and hate a movie, but please stop filling up these forums with your puerile and insignificant rantings and let us 'dumb idiots' enjoy our movies and then talk about them together without having to trawl through your inane crap.

reply

Well here is my 10 cents worth...


Hope you still had money for lunch.

Q: If you do not like their comments, why do you read them?

For the rest of you that don't like these types of movie, why do you still watch them? And then further waste your time by coming here and commenting on them?



If I watch this I will probably skip though all of the Seth Rogan and male nudity parts. Out of 90 minutes or so, that should leave about 30 minutes. 😜

reply

Well I expected hostility, I also expected stupidity and ignorance.

But this is just boring and missing the point.

I can't 'not read them', I have to scroll through all the stupid posts e.g. 'Worst movie I have ever seen', 'Seth rogen is a douche', '6.2 for this load of *beep*

You tell me how I'm supposed to 'not read' these titles when looking through the forums of almost any film below 7/10 on IMDB.

And I don't read these posts, never. My time is too valuable to me to read the drivel these people spread about.

This post is an experiment of sorts, just to see how many amiable people out there on the forums agree with me, and how many would rather just start a fight, flame or troll.

reply

Well i found the movie to be hilarious. When Zack jumped on the air bag & got messed up i was on the floor rolling. Seth Rogen has a humor that's an acquired taste. This is the end was one of the funniest movies ever.

But i totally agree. To call people xxxx because they enjoyed the movie is just a douchebag move. We all like different things.

reply

astronaut1, this is a movie comment board, not the NY Times. And who is the main consumer of movies?--puerile, insignificant kids. Throw in puerile adults who are offended by sex-related jokes or by gay characters in movies, and voila!, a comment board overflowing with stupidity.
I gave the movie a 6, because I thought it lost its comedic edge in the last 20-30 minutes.

reply

*beep* seth rogen.

he is cancer.

fat lil dicked cuck.

reply

See what I mean? ithappens is the same guy who said "atheism is a religion.
atheists are like 17th century folks who doubted the existance of gravity. they have a blind belief that it doesn't exist."
Talk about puerile! Not surprising he didn't take to this raunchy movie as he obviously is an athiest in regard to potty humor. But I'm sure he's an upright christian fellow, only taking time off now and then every day to judge his fellows ("fat lil dicked cuck"--I'm sure it has some deep religious meaning) righteously on comment boards.

reply