The Butler Did It (speculation)
Does anybody want to speculate on the motives of the butler? Reviews keep indicating that the 'devoted' Madelbos is 'protective' of Marguerite - that he is constantly trying to protect her from the truth.
But I read something else into his curious behavior - he strikes me as being legitimately (and deliberately) subversive.
Madelbos only appears to be protecting Marguerite so as to indulge and/or expose the hypocrisy of the people around him. Towards the end of the film, he goes so far as to 'sacrifice' her for the truth.
Unlike the so called anarchists - who also seem to be deluded about the legitimacy of their subversive actions - Madelbos seems intent on pushing the social order to its limits.
He can readily - and literally - see that appearances are an illusion, and he keeps putting people in the awkward position of having to lie to poor Marguerite. Madelbos appears to want to perpetuate the lie in order to reveal the truth of other people's characters.
The fact that he is an amateur photographer is not without significance of course - although I'm not sure of the role that his photography actively plays: do most of the photos reveal the lie, or are they complicit with it?
Instead of protecting Marguerite, Madelbos appears to be setting out to destroy her. He seems to be playing a long con or a different game than mere 'devotion' and 'protection'. As far as I can tell, he wants to undermine the lie from within - if only so as to preserve the moment of truth for posterity.
Any thoughts welcome.