Bob is innocent! HBO are malicious scums


Seriously, HBO are literally so biased and were out to get him from the start. Bob is innocent until proven guilty.

bob didn't do any of the crimes...He was just involved in a series of unfortunate coincidences and circumstances.

FREEBOB

reply

Buuuuut you gonna deny that he didn't kill
His neighbour, cut him up and throw in the sea?

Because, he even admitted he did that. Sooooo yeah. Still cut up a body. Takes a sick soul to do that. Plus he might have done that before..

reply

The filmmaker Jarecki is clearly not biased and out to try get him though- he even seems to have developed a kind of rapport with Durst and he's hesitant to call him out for the handwriting at the end, he doesn't want it to come across as a 'cold' attack.
He just can't deny the blatant evidence right in front of him! Without all of his money Durst would have been proven guilty a looooong time ago.

No one can be that unlucky.

reply

Besides the handwriting comparison of the letters, Bob's burping at the end had guilt written all over it.

reply

While the evidence overwhelmingly points to him being guilty, burping or facial gestures or whatever aren't proof of anything. If I were guilty or not I would probably have a lot of anxiety in that type of situation and I'd most likely be fidgety.

----------------

"Spews venom like a poisonous pit viper."

reply

Out to get him? Hold up a minute--Durst is the one who contacted the filmmakers himself and said he'd like to tell his side of the story after he saw Jarecki's only (to date) non-documentary film ALL GOOD THINGS, a fictionalized story of the Durst case. So nobody made him do jack. He put himself up there to be examined,plain and simple. Apparently his arrogance overrode his common sense, and he figured that no one would really question his views on events in his cases. He figured wrong, obviously, which is why he's been arrested.

reply

Couldn't have said it better myself!

reply

Lol the film crew wasn't a bunch of valiant truth finders. They were trying to bust him. Durst was under the impression he was going to tell his side of the story and that Jarecki was on his side. Jarecki kind of betrayed that trust and to me a lot of that is exploitation of a guy trying to make it big with a documentary.

----------------

"Spews venom like a poisonous pit viper."

reply