Making Judgments
Having watched "The Late Late Show" on CBS since its original incarnation with Tom Snyder, I was disappointed to learn that Craig Ferguson was leaving. And like most Americans, upon learning that James Corden was being considered to take the helm at 12:35 I responded first with a "Who?," followed by a "WTF is Les Moonves thinking?"
I admit almost a resentment, not toward James Corden, but toward CBS for (a) not giving Craig Ferguson greater consideration to take over for David Letterman and the "Late Show" chair, and (b) opting to go with an unknown (to Americans) commodity, rather than a "name" that would be at least marginally recognized.
But the more I think about it, the more that attitude fades, and as we approach the debut of "Late Late Show with James Corden," I think I'm prepared to do as I did with Craig Kilborn and Craig Ferguson before him: judge the show on its own merit, rather than make comparisons to the hosts that preceded them. And I encourage you to do the same.
James Corden has said his version of the "Late Late Show" will be *beep* That may very well prove true. Or it could be groundbreaking, bringing across the Atlantic comedic concepts that haven't been seen here before. Time will tell. But rather than jump on him from the outset and say, "He's no Craig Ferguson," let's try to be objective in any criticism of James Corden.