But he was taken from her in the first place, into state custody - long before the kidnapping. So there was something about her or her environment that was deemed unfit, in which to raise a child. So he might have been given up for adoption anyway (she hadn't gotten custody back - she was on her way to a MEETING with the court, social workers).
And just to play devil's advocate, the adoptive parents are supposed to act in the best interests of the child, and perhaps they thought it would be too confusing and perhaps even detrimental to the boy now (even though he's now old enough to understand what happened on a cognitive level, it could still be to much of an emotional scar now to 'impose' on him. No, it's not fair, but since when is life 'fair'? (besides, she wasn't a very responsible parent no matter who's to blame directly, as again, he was removed from her custody by age 2).
reply
share