exceptionally misleading trailer
Trailer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blAKCJcXC5c
Having just seen the film, it was interesting to go back and watch the trailer. There are essentially only two action sequences in the film, and moments from these are cut together to create a sense of corny, generic action that, of course, is not in the film (ie, Cillian Murphy running forward and firing from the balcony, and when referring to Heydrich's brutality, showing him standing up from his car with a pistol and shooting, as if he butchered Prague personally. That, and super corny dialogue that never appeared in the movie at all: "If we fail, I fear that freedom will be wiped from the map!" and then that ending: "In August 2016, Resistance has a name." All in all, it was about as kinetic and mainstream as a Marvel trailer.
Instead, I was very pleasantly surprised (and impressed) to find this slow-burn, minimalist art-house film that is relentlessly realistic and unsentimental. I wonder if part of the negative perception from many viewers has to do with thwarted expectations. It is true - this film is not exciting or feel-good in any sense. An accurate trailer would have focused a lot more on panic attacks, tedium, and the inevitability of death. But I'm sure that there was some desperation when the studio saw the final cut - they'd made a very good film with some truly great sequences, but not exactly a summer blockbuster. I hope it makes money, or at least gets it's due come awards season.