MovieChat Forums > 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi (2016) Discussion > Anyone that votes for Hillary after seei...

Anyone that votes for Hillary after seeing this is INSANE...

posted 9 years ago by ThomasMagnumPI
44 replies | jump to latest

or else is willfully ignorant.

The movie amazingly illustrates the events of that night. Without getting overly political, it informs the viewer of what happened in riveting detail. It leaves the “why did this happen and who is to blame” for the viewer to decide. Anyone that knows what happened in the lead up and certainly what happens in the attempted cover up knows how deeply this involves Hillary. Let's hope this movie will be a key in making it just an "attempted" cover up and that they won't get away with dishonesty or get away with not taking the blame.

[–] violence_and_electronic_music 9 years ago

This a movie about the horrors of war in the 21st century and the brave soldiers fighting a war they don't comprehend in countries that mean nothing to them. Don't drag Hillary and politics into a deeply human story focused on individuals braver than we'll ever be.

[–] Terrapin2212 9 years ago

But we need to ask ourselves WHY they died. Why did it take an entire 13 HOURS and support never showed up, even after a US diplomatic compound came under attack by terrorists?

And then how Hillary lied about how it was caused by the Innocence of Muslims riots when it was clearly an attack that had been planned long in advance.

[–] Shaftaire_of_Astora 9 years ago

Do you not question why wars are fought by soldiers who don't understand why in countries that mean nothing to them?

[–] truther 9 years ago

Anyone that knows what happened in the lead up and certainly what happens in the attempted cover up knows how deeply this involves Hillary.

And nobody who thinks this way was ever going to vote for Hillary in the first place, so your whole argument is a non sequitur.

[–] jeffmtait 9 years ago

Cover up? Cover up of what?

[–] CGSailor 9 years ago

Cover up? Cover up of what?

Guess you missed the whole thing about Hillary lying to the American public, claiming it was just spontaneous outrages over some video, rather than the organized terrorist attack they knew it really was.

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

[–] glennthoward 9 years ago

Anyone who forms their opinion from a movie should not vote period.

[–] aspencork 9 years ago

The same can be said for all of those who form all of their opinions from watching SNL or Jon Stewart when he was on Comedy Central.

[–] cromartie890 9 years ago

What a fool. Even the Republicans that spent millions to investigate said it wasn't her fault in the end after they wasted all that tax payer money. Its a film by Michael Bay do you think Transformer or Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles is factual also. A film only has to be 10% factual to legally say its based on a true story.

[–] kevn96 9 years ago

Basing your vote on a film is not very smart, but using it as a springboard to research and investigate more is smart. Clinton and Obama did nothing wrong that night, but just like Nixon found out, it's the cover up that comes back to bite you in the butt. Hillary emailed several people that it was an organized terror attack the next day. She then told the families of the KIA that it was a result of a cheesy, amateurish YouTube video. She and Obama then had Susan Rice keep repeating the lie. All presidents have blood on their hands: Bush for Iraq, Clinton and Somalia, Reagan and Iran/Contra and on and on. The coverup shows the lying. Hillary is too stupid to be president; she needed to be smart enough not to have her lies exposed.

This film is about as truthful as Black Hawk Down, Lone Survivor and American Sniper, to name a few, but it's a good start to show what Hillary Clinton and Obama didn't want us to know.

[–] max_indigo 9 years ago

Exactly. Obama was two months away from his re-election so he ordered his staff to quash the terror talking point and went on to blame the video for the attack. I don't like her but Hillary only did what she was ordered to do.

[–] radrobd 9 years ago

I don't like her but Hillary only did what she was ordered to do.

Really?! You're going to defend Killary using the Nazi defense. That's what the Nazis said when they were charged with war crimes, they were just following orders. Even if true, when Killary left State, she could have changed her story. She lies so much, making up a new one would have been easier for her. Instead, Killary has only dug her heels in further.

[–] chrislwmn3 9 years ago

Wait! Are you saying that Transformers and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles are true? Do you have any other arguments or do you just like to copy and paste the same words into each thread?

Let me say that I haven't seen the film, but I also get the idea that you haven't. You've yet to point out any particular moments that the film really dropped the ball on. If you had, it would have given your statements more weight, but as it stands you just come across as an angry, low IQ lefty complaining about angry, low IQ righties. its hilarious.

[–] ba_bam_bam 9 years ago

Lots of crazy people in the world I guess.

[–] chrislwmn3 9 years ago

That's the truth. They're raised a democrat or republican and never decide to think for themselves.

[–] carrowsboy 9 years ago

Geez, I bet OP thought American Sniper was 100% true and accurate, as well.

[–] binaryvegeta 9 years ago

American Sniper was 100% true and accurate! HOW dare YOU!

Michael Bay told 100% of the the truth as well.! I watch nothing but Fox news!

[–] Marvelouis 9 years ago

A film can be true but not have to be 100% real to life. It's called artistic licence. Without it, we're talking documentary. Why do films like Blackhawk Down or We Were Soldiers take no heat but when a film correctly depicts events that makes the Obama administration look bad then dramatic expression isn't allowed?

[–] TyrionLannister1 9 years ago

when a film correctly depicts events that makes the Obama administration look bad then dramatic expression isn't allowed?

Except the film at no point makes the Obama admin look bad, as the administration was never shown in the film. Most Anti Obama haters will always see anti Obama nonsense just as they fabricated the Birther nonsense.

[–] radrobd 9 years ago

Except the film at no point makes the Obama admin look bad, as the administration was never shown in the film. Most Anti Obama haters will always see anti Obama nonsense just as they fabricated the Birther nonsense.

The film clearly shows there was no protest that went awry. That this was a pre-planned attack. So, yes, it makes Obama and his administration look bad for lying about it. Obama was two months away from the 2012 election. A terrorist attack on an American compound on the 11th anniversary of 9/11 would have hurt his chances for re-election. So he, Killary, Susan Rice, Jay Carney et. al. fabricated and repeated a lie about a protest gone awry, blaming it on a little seen YouTube video. The film does mention the video, but not in that sense. Towards the end of the movie when the attacks are almost over, John Krazinski's character calls home to the U.S. and hears the news is reporting the B.S. about a YouTube video and protest gone awry and he scoff that there was no protest.

Further, the film makes the Obama administration look bad for not supplying ANY assistance whatsoever and asking the GRS at the annex to stand down. There was a drone flying overheard providing live-time video to the White House and Pentagon. Obama couldn't be bothered. He had a flight to Vegas in the morning to campaign.

This doesn't bode well for Killary. This wa her 3 a.m. phone call and she let it go to voicemail.

[–] ba_bam_bam 9 years ago

They're all corrupt.

[–] cromartie890 9 years ago

Really? Well the actors in the film that worked with the people that were there that wrote the book ars doing interviews saying how it wasn't Hillary's fault at all. Imagine that...

But I guess you think a film will stop people from voting for her. If you believe that I pity you.

This is a film by a conservative director who has criticize the president in his other bad movies. Is movie if an attempt to profit during the political season, to make the money off of the story go our passions are high. To make money off the death of these Americans. What is hurting you think it's some truth serum to be shared with the world. When is nothing more than a money grab.

[–] binaryvegeta 9 years ago

I am voting for her now because of you and this movie!

HEY MY whole STATE IS voting for her baby so suck on that.

[–] Marvelouis 9 years ago

Certain voters would vote for Hitler's brain in a jar if it had a (D) next to it on the ballot. That's the sad state of American politics today.

JFK's Democratic Party is long dead.

[–] TyrionLannister1 9 years ago

Actually it's more accurate to say some voters would vote for Hitler's mustache in a jar if it had an R next to it. Funny how wingers always have to bring up "Hitler," when at a loss of a good argumnet, but Democrats are the problem? Lol. Good one.

I haven't heard Democrats demonize groups of people yet, or play hate politics demonizing one group like Republicans do every election season, so that statement is false on the merits alone. R's are way more closely related to Hitlerian politics and bigotry than Democrats will ever be.

[–] liven1812 9 years ago

"I haven't heard Democrats demonize groups of people yet"

......... LOLOLOLOLOL

[–] Marvelouis 9 years ago

Can Bernie Sanders pull the upset and send Hillary home to grant Bill that divorce he's been wanting for years now?

[–] aspencork 9 years ago

FDR was a Democrat. Check out his Executive Order #9066: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_9066

“In the European century that began in the 1840s from Engels's article of 1849 down to the death of Hitler, everyone who advocated genocide called himself a socialist, and no exception has been found” (p 80, Watson, George. Lost Literature of Socialism. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press, 1998).

Which party is that has a self avowed socialist on its ticket?