To the people defending the thieves (part two)
I posted an earlier post against the people defending the thieves and got some flack for it, so maybe I need to reitterate my point, since it was obviously missed. I wasn't comparing who was worse, (the thieves or the blind man), ...I was simply saying that he had a right to defend himself against people breaking and entering with a firearm. And since he was blind, he was even more vulnerable and had to defend himself by any means necessary. Even if he didn't know about the firearm, he still didn't know who these people were or why they were there. How scared would you be if you were blind and people broke in? I am glad I live in a state that allows you to shoot an intruder. What are you people thinking who are against laws like that? Liberalism is a mental disorder.
share