huge plot hole


When the blind American war veteran whose house the three young thieves break in to has the girl tied up he uses a pair of scissors to create an opening in her pants so that he can then insert a turkey baster into her vagina for the purpose of filling her uterus with spermatozoa in order to get her pregnant with a new daughter but later when she crawls into the car trunk to trap the dog you can clearly see that the crotch of her pants is completely intact. I paused to zoomed in and examined it closeup but I couldn't see any hint what so ever of a cut or tear in the fabric around her crotch. It really irks me that no body in Hollywood these days seems to have even the slightest clue as to how to go about making a movie anymore.

reply

If they didn't want to show her "parts", they could have just had her change into pants belonging to that girl, or maybe the blind man's.

It's very obvious the critics got paid off or influenced to rave about this movie. It was unbelievably bad.

reply

You are so right.. it's a hundred plot holes woven together to make a psuedohorror

reply

That's a continuity error, not a plot hole. The plot isn't effected by this.


"I'll hit you with so many rights you'll be begging for a left."

reply

It's enough to take you out of the movie.

reply

not for me, i didnt notice...I don't think anyone would notice unless they were specifically looking for the cut in her pants.


"I'll hit you with so many rights you'll be begging for a left."

reply

Agreed. For this to be a plot hole, some element of the plot needs to depend on the state of her pants being intact. This is much more of a continuity issue and not a very big one either.

reply

I think the bigger plot hole was how he was able to find his way back to his house after catching up to Rocky at the car, which is still odd, and easily finding his way back to his house while dragging her. I mean come on.

((Damn the remakes, Save the originals.))

reply