Thanos Vs Snoke
Not who would win but a comparison of the writing of these characters.
I was never interested by Thanos - he seemed like the very definition of a comic book villain and all the negative stereotypes that implies: ridiculous, over the top, paper thin motivations, purple, etc. But fuck if they didn't make the character work. They took something that could, maybe should have been awful and breathed life into it and in doing so created - for me - an utterly captivating villain. Thanos is a product of time, effort, skill and dedication... and arguably they didn't even need to try so hard, IW was always going to make $Billions no matter what they did.
And then there's Snoke, the principle villain of Nu Star Wars, the character with arguably more impact to the story line than any other: he was the one who saved the Empire, turned Kylo Ren, built the Star Killer etc etc and just look what they did with this character. They didn't even bother. Didn't even try. Didn't even care. JJ treated him as a place holder and RJ used him as an 'expectations inverter'. I mean seriously - even if you liked these films how long did the two of them spend writing that guy, combined? 5 minutes. An hour?
What timeline are we in when Marvel villains have depth, pathos and gravitas whilst Star Wars villains are written as if by a child doing his homework on the school bus on the way to school?