Seems thrilling but it's just bad to misinform people. National Geographic used to be about information. Now it's just cable crap.
The book was a fair read but too much fictionalized. I consequently dropped the TV series (apart from wanting to see the vomit scene, which is disappointing) as I see no reason to endorse spreading false rumours about real diseases. On the plus side, reading it has made me research a bit about Ebola and Marburg online. Very interesting and, fortunately, not as alarming as the book warns for. The real danger is lack of education and poverty.
The book is excellent. I read it just a few weeks ago after seeing the trailer for the show. It's easily one of the best books I've read in a long time.
I read The Hot Zone back in 1995, it was a huge bestseller and it was terrifying. I even bought the cassette audio-book for my parents. The guy who wrote The Hot Zone also wrote Demon in the Freezer, it was another book about deadly viruses, this time mostly smallpox..still very frightening.
I don't understand how come they don't know what animal Ebola comes from, you'd think they would have figured it out by now.
I remember seeing the book on shelves all those years ago, but I didn't pick it up at the time. I probably should have. As you say, it's a terrifying story and the book is SO well-written. Preston's decision to write it as a thriller was an inspired choice. It worked perfectly.
The book also has one of those covers that for some reason just etches itself into your mind. Even after not seeing the book for years, when I bought it recently I instantly recognized the cover.
I considered picking up Demon in the Freezer but the reviews for that one seemed much more mixed. Did you enjoy it?
I love that cover of Hot Zone too..I was in the Air Force and the sent me to Haiti to support the Army after they deposed the dictator there. Haiti had been hit with an AIDS epidemic so it was surreal to read The Hot Zone there.
Years, later I read Demon in the Freezer. There was no way to duplicate the terror of the first book but man, that book is still worth reading. Preston really knows how to get under your skin when he writes about how viruses can turn your organs into mush. In Demon, he describes how god awful the Smallpox was and how it was an agonizing death for so many millions over the centuries..and there was nothing you could do once you contracted it..there's also a heroic section where he describes how WHO decided to eradicate smallpox from the planet earth, they have done humanity a great service. The rest of the book is still good but there was so much going on with terrorism and the anthrax attacks around that time that the book kinda gets lost. He probably could have written 2 small books; one on smallpox, the other on anthrax, which would have been a lot more successful. I didn't really know what smallpox was, it was your worst nightmare that's for sure.
You know, that's what I've heard, that the book is less focused than The Hot Zone, and that Preston seems less sure of exactly where he wants to go with the story.
But it sounds like it's still worth the read, so I'm sure I will pick it up at some point. I really can't say I know much about smallpox.
It's definitely worth the read..from what I remember the author, Richard Preston, had released a fictional virus book called Cobra Event in 98 but I'm not a fiction reader at all, except for Stephen King in the early 80's. I will say I give the guy credit he took his time writing books and wrote about disparate subjects before and after he found his virus thriller niche. Funny, I never even tried watching Outbreak, I think I would have if they had made a super scary gross out thriller but it turned into more of a humdrum typical Hollywood affair. They're smart to go back to the source material and make this min-series. I've got to finish Catch-22 and then Chernobyl and then I'll watch Hot Zone. Honestly, this is the first time in years I'm watching any TV besides Dateline and 48 Hours, the entertainment well has been dry for so long!
I actually watched Outbreak while I was in the middle of reading The Hot Zone, just because I knew the film was (very loosely) based on the book. The movie is actually pretty good, so long as you go into it ready for a Hollywood action-thriller. The cast is stellar!
Catch-22 doesn't interest me much, but I am also watching Chernobyl. It's pretty good!
The Hot Zone mini-series has also been pretty good so far. It's certainly well-made and well-acted. My only complaint really has nothing to do with the show, and that's that if you have read the book then the show doesn't have much in the way of narrative surprises.
Yes, that's the problem with how great the book version of The Hot Zone is..the author is so vivid, you feel like you're actually there in Kitum cave, with the billion old virus seeping up at your feet or leaking from the cave ceiling above. The movie or TV version can't really compete if you've read the book; it's like you've already been on the scariest roller coaster ever and can't be bothered riding a merry go round.
I love the book, it was a thriller that made you feel like you were there, in that Kitum cave in Africa. The writer knew how to keep you in suspense that's for sure.
Not sure why the OP edited his post--it's basically a totally different post than he started with--but in any case, I don't agree.
The book was a little sensationalistic, and even the author has said he thinks he went a little too far in his descriptions of what Ebola does to the body, but it didn't really "fictionalize" Ebola. Furthermore, it's an excellent book, and the mini-series has been pretty good too.
Feel free to edit your post if you changed your opinion. But please don't tell me I cannot change mine. If my edit means holding a pin to the bubble of like-mindedness that people tend to zone into on the internet then the more power to it.
It's akin to creating a thread that says "I love Jurassic Park!" and having people respond "I agree!" and then changing your OP to "Jurassic Park sucks!"
Anyway, not a huge deal. Of course you can change your opinion, but probably would've been better to have stated your new opinion as a reponse to the thread.
Well frankly I don't think the book "fictionalizes" Ebola.
He might overstate, or sensationalize, some of the symptoms but that would be the extent of the fictionalizing, if you want to call it that.
Something else to keep in mind is that the book was written in 1994, and we have learned a lot more about Ebola since then. So you can't expect the science stated in the book to be caught up on all the advances that have occurred since its publication.
As for the mini-series, I also think it's important to remember that it is a dramatized piece of entertainment that is based on real events and not a documentary. It's not like NatGeo is pretending it is anything else.
I thought it was pretty good, for the most part. It can't live up to its excellent source material, but the book set a high bar.
A quick review of your post history indicates that you have commented on several scripted shows and movies so this seems like a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
Apparently you're not against scripted television at all. But somehow it becomes debased and evil when it airs on a network like NatGeo.