Why do non prostitute synths have genitals?
Why would Anita (Nanny/Housekeeper) have breasts or a vagina? Wouldn't it make more sense for her to look like a Barbie when naked?
shareThey are multi-purpose Synth , the cost of producing a synth with no genital is almost the same as one with genital.
And the cost of another production line are expensive .
They have adult option with codes , if the owner wants to use the adult option , they input the code , it they don't then don't use it .
Even if they don't put genital on the robot , the user can just use another hole like the mouth or ear
Haha if you say so...
shareWhat do you mean if you say so? Pay attention to the show, guy. We know synths are hacked and illegally modified by retailers.
You're dumb if that's escaped your attention by this point.
I don't know him. That got nothin' to do with me.
What do you mean if you say so? Pay attention to the show, guy.
He did, and there hasn't been ONE line of dialogue on this show uttered saying that synths without genital costs as much as ones with them. Of course there isn't, because that would be impossible.
You're dumb if that's escaped your attention by this point.
And I think that people who think that it costs the same to produce a synth with no sexual parts as it does to produce one with real, working sexual parts so realistic that they're indistinguishable from the real thing are the dumb ones.
---
Emojis=๐ฉ Emoticons=๎ share
Recycled
Repurposed
Modified
All terms used throughout the show. Where's the production value in having synths with and without genitals if they're ultimately put back on a conveyer belt for resale?
We don't need spoon fed as an audience. Or, some of us don't, at least.
I don't know him. That got nothin' to do with me.
Recycled
Repurposed
Modified
All terms used throughout the show. Where's the production value in having synths with and without genitals if they're ultimately put back on a conveyer belt for resale?
The issue with having synths with genitalia has less to do with "production value" than with how their inclusion would affect the bottom line. If a synth with "workable" sex parts costs at least 2-3x more than one without, it would leave out an entire market of user that can't afford a synth for ANY purpose that has nothing to do with sex--home aid, a cook, a housekeeper, nanny, etc. No company on the planet would ever pass up the opportunity to create genitalia-less synths if it guaranteed a larger number of sales/commissions from a market that wouldn't have been able to afford them otherwise.
This is neither here nor there because in the end, this is all about challenging the notion that synths with sex parts could be made at the same cost as synths without. And it's absurd. The parts would have to be made of specialized, more costly material in addition to the "basic" material that a "synth" with no sex parts would be made of--things like a silicon/gel-type implant for the breasts and material to simulate the fleshiness of both female and male genitalia, as well as the "cavities." If people think that the difference in production costs between a "basic" synth and one with genitalia wouldn't be significant, they're fooling themselves.
We don't need spoon fed as an audience. Or, some of us don't, at least.
Don't confuse your capacity for patronization for being "intelligent."
---
Emojis=๐ฉ Emoticons=๎ share
Reported.
I don't know him. That got nothin' to do with me.
Why would it cost 2x-3x more? ๎ If anything, it might be cheaper to have one product line and streamline the process with volume-discounts on parts. And they may very well provide cheaper, stripped-down models, but like any business, they want to make money, so they will provide fewer choices so that they can pressure people into buying more. This is similar to how ISPs will make a cheap lower tier that is completely useless, then the next tier up is a huge step up with a much higher price; they could provide more variety, but then people would not be forced to pay more for more than they need/want.
(Response notification is off.)
The production line argument is sort of invalid anyway, because it is already clear that they customize the bots. They go out of their way to make each and every synth "unique", as the show put it. It makes no sense why the default home care/general family bot would have genitalia. Just having one around with those features would cause issues with many parents and their kids for instance. It is just impractical for business.
From a business standpoint, more family oriented customers would want a version without genitalia. Even assuming (it is a very long logic stretch) there wasn't one already, the millions of customers with preferences would more than offset R&D cost for a whole extra line - eventually bottoming out the cost, and in fact - giving you a large income gap because no one else is selling them.
You could market it as "We are the FAMILY friendly company", things along those lines, etc.
Of course, certain people, single, married (most probably without children), may still choose, or prefer to have lines with them, but there would be high demand for both, and thus this whole topic is actually quite a valid logic pitfall of the show. At least half of them in this show so far make little sense to why they have genitalia.
Modified
I guess that would be an adadictomy? At least that is what my genitourologist buddy called it.
I think my percentage of Chimp DNA is higher than others. Cleaver Greene share
Settle down, synthf^cker.
ใฐใฐใฐใฐใฐใฐ
http://bit.ly/1ILVn4O
I always figured you for a humanlike robot.
I don't know him. That got nothin' to do with me.
Are you saying you want to make the sex with me?
ใฐใฐใฐใฐใฐใฐ
http://bit.ly/1ILVn4O
What does your programming say to that?
I don't know him. That got nothin' to do with me.
Thank you, come again.
ใฐใฐใฐใฐใฐใฐ
http://bit.ly/1ILVn4O
I see your programming understands innuendo's.
I don't know him. That got nothin' to do with me.
What a stupid response to a reply that accurately answered your question. Which, by the way, was EXPLAINED IN THE SHOW had you been paying attention.
shareEven if they don't put genital on the robot , the user can just use another hole like the mouth or ear
๎ฆ
That was my laugh of the day...Thanks!
"Brag all you want, but don't get in between me and the bloodwine!!!!! -Benjamin Sisko" share
I also thought about production costs, but there seems to be so many different models.
But maybe the company is keeping all options open, like a mistress model for old lonesome people...